februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0071_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#French Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of scientific studies – Calculation of lung overload in particles – ‘Decisive’ nature of a scientific study – Distortion of the evidence – Error of law – Choice of calculation parameters – Particle density – Scientific assessment – Exceeding the limits of judicial review – C
marec 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0072: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-72/23 P.
oktober 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0072_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-72/23 P.
september 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0073: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Chaudfontaine Loisirs SA v État belge, représenté par le Ministre des Finances.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 135(1)(i) – Exemptions – Betting, lotteries and other forms of gambling – Conditions and limits – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Maintenance of the effects of a piece of national legislation – Entitlement to refund – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-73/23.
marec 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0076: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier.#Case C-76/23.
december 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0076_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#Cobult UG v TAP Air Portugal SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 7(3) – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Reimbursement in travel vouchers – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Reimbursement procedure through a form available on the website of the operating air carrier.#Case C-76/23.
april 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0079: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#FJ v Agrárminiszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes for farmers – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Single area payment scheme – Article 58 – Reductions and exclusions applicable in the event of over-declarations – Penalty for over-declaration exceeding 50% of the area determined – Recovery of the amount of the penalty during the three calendar years following the calendar year of the finding – Concept of ‘finding’ – Control report finding irregularities in the aid application concerned.#Case C-79/23.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0079_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#FJ v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes for farmers – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Single area payment scheme – Article 58 – Reductions and exclusions applicable in the event of over-declarations – Penalty for over-declaration exceeding 50% of the area determined – Recovery of the amount of the penalty during the three calendar years following the calendar year of the finding – Concept of ‘finding’ – Control report finding irregularities in the aid application concerned.#Case C-79/23.
november 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0080: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti, Glavna direktsia za borba s organiziranata prestapnost v V.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(a) to (c) – Article 8(1) and (2) – Article 10 – Accused person – Police record containing biometric and genetic data – Enforcement – Objectives of prevention and detection of criminal offences – Interpretation of the judgment of 26 January 2023, Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti (Recording of biometric and genetic data by the police) (C‑205/21, EU:C:2023:49) – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law – Assessment of whether it is ‘strictly ne
februar 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0081: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#MA v FCA Italy SpA and FPT Industrial SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Point 2 of Article 7 – Special jurisdiction in tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the damage occurred – Use on a vehicle of a defeat device that reduces the effectiveness of emission control systems – Contract for the sale of that vehicle concluded in a Member State other than the State in which the purchaser is domiciled and in which the manufacturer has its seat – Delivery of that vehicle and normal use of it in the Member State in which the purchaser is domiciled.#Case C-81/23.