﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!--RSS Genrated: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:02:23 GMT--><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ev="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/event/"><channel><title>Modro poslovanje=varno in uspešno poslovanje - Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI)</title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online:443/BAZA-ZNANJA/rss/category/1285/praksa-sodišča-eu-davki</link><atom:link href="https://modro.infomedia.online:443/BAZA-ZNANJA/rss/category/1285/praksa-sodišča-eu-davki" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><description>RSS document</description><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:61982CC0039: Sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca - Rozès - 11. novembra 1982. # Andreas Matthias Donner proti Nizozemski državi. # Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe: Kantongerecht 's]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex61982cc0039-sklepni-predlogi-generalnega-pravobranilca-roz232s-11-novembra-1982-andreas-matthias-donner-proti-nizozemski-dr%c5%beavi-predlog-za-sprejetje-predhodne-odlo%c4%8dbe-kantongerecht-s-graven</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 03:43:23 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex61982cc0039-sklepni-predlogi-generalnega-pravobranilca-roz232s-11-novembra-1982-andreas-matthias-donner-proti-nizozemski-dr%c5%beavi-predlog-za-sprejetje-predhodne-odlo%c4%8dbe-kantongerecht-s-graven</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-304407]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62006TJ0161: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 October 2012.#Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater v European Commission.#Action for damages — ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Grants made for projects — Claims for payment of various sums — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissible.#Case T‑161/06.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62006tj0161-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-25-october-2012arbos-gesellschaft-für-musik-und-theater-v-european-commissionaction-for-damages-culture-2000-programme-grants-made-for-projects-claims-for-payment-of-various-sums-article-441c-of-the-rules-of-procedure-inadmissiblecase-t16106</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:59:27 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62006tj0161-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-25-october-2012arbos-gesellschaft-für-musik-und-theater-v-european-commissionaction-for-damages-culture-2000-programme-grants-made-for-projects-claims-for-payment-of-various-sums-article-441c-of-the-rules-of-procedure-inadmissiblecase-t16106</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-338001]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62009TA0286(01): Case T-286/09 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2022 — Intel Corporation v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Microprocessors market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Loyalty rebates — ‘Naked’ restrictions — Characterisation as abuse — As-efficient-competitor analysis — Overall strategy — Single and continuous infringement)]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62009ta028601-case-t-28609-renv-judgment-of-the-general-court-of-26-january-2022-intel-corporation-v-commission-competition-abuse-of-dominant-position-microprocessors-market-decision-finding-an-infringement-of-article-102-tfeu-and-of-article-54-of-the-eea-agreement-loyalty-rebates-naked-restrictions-characterisation-as-abuse-as-efficient-competitor-analysis-overall-strategy-single-and-continuous-infringement</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62009ta028601-case-t-28609-renv-judgment-of-the-general-court-of-26-january-2022-intel-corporation-v-commission-competition-abuse-of-dominant-position-microprocessors-market-decision-finding-an-infringement-of-article-102-tfeu-and-of-article-54-of-the-eea-agreement-loyalty-rebates-naked-restrictions-characterisation-as-abuse-as-efficient-competitor-analysis-overall-strategy-single-and-continuous-infringement</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-309660]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62009TJ0286(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 26 January 2022.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and of Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Loyalty rebates – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Characterisation as abuse – As-efficient-competitor analysis – Overall strategy – Single and continuous infringement.#Case T-286/09 RENV.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62009tj028601-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-fourth-chamber-extended-composition-of-26-january-2022intel-corporation-inc-v-european-commissioncompetition-abuse-of-dominant-position-microprocessors-market-decision-finding-an-infringement-of-article-102-tfeu-and-of-article-54-of-the-eea-agreement-loyalty-rebates-naked-restrictions-characterisation-as-abuse-as-efficient-competitor-analysis-overall-strategy-single-and-continuous-infringementcase-t-28609-renv</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 05:32:48 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62009tj028601-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-fourth-chamber-extended-composition-of-26-january-2022intel-corporation-inc-v-european-commissioncompetition-abuse-of-dominant-position-microprocessors-market-decision-finding-an-infringement-of-article-102-tfeu-and-of-article-54-of-the-eea-agreement-loyalty-rebates-naked-restrictions-characterisation-as-abuse-as-efficient-competitor-analysis-overall-strategy-single-and-continuous-infringementcase-t-28609-renv</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-328430]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62009TO0286: Rectification order of 10 March 2022.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Rectification.#Case T-286/09 RENV.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62009to0286-rectification-order-of-10-march-2022intel-corporation-inc-v-european-commissionrectificationcase-t-28609-renv</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 19:40:38 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62009to0286-rectification-order-of-10-march-2022intel-corporation-inc-v-european-commissionrectificationcase-t-28609-renv</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-309700]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62010TJ0271(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#H v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – National staff member on secondment to the EUPM in Bosnia and Herzegovina – Redeployment decision – Misuse of powers – Interests of the service – Psychological harassment – Punitive nature of the redeployment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-271/10 RENV II.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62010tj027101-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-third-chamber-of-18-november-2020h-v-council-of-the-european-unioncommon-foreign-and-security-policy-national-staff-member-on-secondment-to-the-eupm-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-redeployment-decision-misuse-of-powers-interests-of-the-service-psychological-harassment-punitive-nature-of-the-redeployment-liability-non-material-damagecase-t-27110-renv-ii</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:33:35 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62010tj027101-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-third-chamber-of-18-november-2020h-v-council-of-the-european-unioncommon-foreign-and-security-policy-national-staff-member-on-secondment-to-the-eupm-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina-redeployment-decision-misuse-of-powers-interests-of-the-service-psychological-harassment-punitive-nature-of-the-redeployment-liability-non-material-damagecase-t-27110-renv-ii</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-328729]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62010TO0309(03): Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 February 2017.#Christoph Klein v European Commission.#Case T-309/10 RENV-REC.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62010to030903-order-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-1-february-2017christoph-klein-v-european-commissioncase-t-30910-renv-rec</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 20:59:44 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62010to030903-order-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-1-february-2017christoph-klein-v-european-commissioncase-t-30910-renv-rec</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-338067]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62011TJ0388_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Deutsche Post AG v European Commission.#State aid – Postal services – Financing of the additional labour and social costs relating to some of the staff of Deutsche Post by means of subsidies and revenue generated by the remuneration for price-regulated services – Decision to extend the formal investigation procedure – Decision establishing the existence of new aid on conclusion of the preliminary investigation stage – Action for annulment – Act open to challenge – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Consequences of annulment of the final decision – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-388/11.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62011tj0388-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-extended-composition-of-10-april-2019deutsche-post-ag-v-european-commissionstate-aid-postal-services-financing-of-the-additional-labour-and-social-costs-relating-to-some-of-the-staff-of-deutsche-post-by-means-of-subsidies-and-revenue-generated-by-the-remuneration-for-price-regulated-services-decision-to-extend-the-formal-investigation-procedure-decision-establishing-the-existence-of-new-aid-on-conclusion-of-the-preliminary-investigation-stage-action-for-annulment-act-open-to-challenge-interest-in-bringing-proceedings-admissibility-consequences-of-annulment-of-the-final-decision-obligation-to-state-reasonscase-t-38811</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 05:34:59 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62011tj0388-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-first-chamber-extended-composition-of-10-april-2019deutsche-post-ag-v-european-commissionstate-aid-postal-services-financing-of-the-additional-labour-and-social-costs-relating-to-some-of-the-staff-of-deutsche-post-by-means-of-subsidies-and-revenue-generated-by-the-remuneration-for-price-regulated-services-decision-to-extend-the-formal-investigation-procedure-decision-establishing-the-existence-of-new-aid-on-conclusion-of-the-preliminary-investigation-stage-action-for-annulment-act-open-to-challenge-interest-in-bringing-proceedings-admissibility-consequences-of-annulment-of-the-final-decision-obligation-to-state-reasonscase-t-38811</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-329314]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62011TJ0479(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#French Republic and IFP Énergies nouvelles v European Commission.#State aid – Oil exploration – State aid scheme implemented by France – Implied and unlimited State guarantee conferred on IFPEN by the grant of the status of EPIC – Advantage – Presumption of an advantage – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-479/11 RENV and T-157/12 RENV.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62011tj047901-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-5-october-2020french-republic-and-ifp-énergies-nouvelles-v-european-commissionstate-aid-oil-exploration-state-aid-scheme-implemented-by-france-implied-and-unlimited-state-guarantee-conferred-on-ifpen-by-the-grant-of-the-status-of-epic-advantage-presumption-of-an-advantage-proportionalityjoined-cases-t-47911-renv-and-t-15712-renv</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 05:33:36 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62011tj047901-res-judgment-of-the-general-court-eighth-chamber-of-5-october-2020french-republic-and-ifp-énergies-nouvelles-v-european-commissionstate-aid-oil-exploration-state-aid-scheme-implemented-by-france-implied-and-unlimited-state-guarantee-conferred-on-ifpen-by-the-grant-of-the-status-of-epic-advantage-presumption-of-an-advantage-proportionalityjoined-cases-t-47911-renv-and-t-15712-renv</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-328743]]></dc:identifier></item><item><dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin MPS]]></dc:creator><title><![CDATA[CELEX:62012CC0066: Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 12 September 2013.#Council of the European Union v European Commission.#Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union — Staff Regulations — Action for annulment — Communication COM(2011) 829 final — Proposal COM(2011) 820 final — Action for failure to act — Submission of proposals on the basis of Article 10 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations — Failure of the Commission — Action devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate.#Case C‑66/12.]]></title><link>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62012cc0066-opinion-of-advocate-general-bot-delivered-on-12september-2013council-of-the-european-union-v-european-commissionannual-adjustment-of-the-remuneration-and-pensions-of-officials-and-other-servants-of-the-european-union-staff-regulations-action-for-annulment-communication-com2011-829-final-proposal-com2011-820-final-action-for-failure-to-act-submission-of-proposals-on-the-basis-of-article10-of-annex-xi-to-the-staff-regulations-failure-of-the-commission-action-devoid-of-purpose-no-need-to-adjudicatecase-c6612</link><description><![CDATA[]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 21:01:17 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://modro.infomedia.online/BAZA-ZNANJA/celex62012cc0066-opinion-of-advocate-general-bot-delivered-on-12september-2013council-of-the-european-union-v-european-commissionannual-adjustment-of-the-remuneration-and-pensions-of-officials-and-other-servants-of-the-european-union-staff-regulations-action-for-annulment-communication-com2011-829-final-proposal-com2011-820-final-action-for-failure-to-act-submission-of-proposals-on-the-basis-of-article10-of-annex-xi-to-the-staff-regulations-failure-of-the-commission-action-devoid-of-purpose-no-need-to-adjudicatecase-c6612</guid><dc:identifier><![CDATA[3d36a592-9ba3-44f3-9fdc-a4e6cedb8355-338564]]></dc:identifier></item></channel></rss>