januar 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0054: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.
junij 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0054_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0057: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#JH v Policejní prezidium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of p
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0057_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#JH v Policejní prezidium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of persons – National legislation which provides for the collecti
september 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0059: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) and Article 108 TFEU – Aid planned for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the site at Paks (Hungary) – Direct award of the construction contract – Directive 2014/25/EU – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Object of the aid – Aspects that are inextricably linked to the aid – Parallel conduct of infringement proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/23 P.
september 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0059_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) and Article 108 TFEU – Aid planned for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the site at Paks (Hungary) – Direct award of the construction contract – Directive 2014/25/EU – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Object of the aid – Aspects that are inextricably linked to the aid – Parallel conduct of infringement proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/23 P.
oktober 18, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0060: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Skatteverket v Digital Charging Solutions GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 14 and 15 – Electric vehicle charging – Charging using devices provided by a company and allowing access to a network of charging points operated by different operators – Classification of the transaction for VAT purposes – ‘Supply of goods’ – Transfer made under commission contracts.#Case C-60/23.
november 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0061: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 21 novembre 2024.#„Еkоstroy“ EOOD contre Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Transports par route – Dispositions fiscales – Directive 1999/62/CE – Taxation des poids lourds pour l’utilisation de certaines infrastructures – Sanctions applicables aux violations des dispositions nationales prises en application de cette directive – Article 9 bis – Exigence de proportionnalité – Réglementation nationale sanctionnant toutes les infractions par une amende d’un montant forfaitaire.#Affaire C-61/23. This document does not exist in English.
junij 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0061_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#„Еkоstroy“ EOOD v Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Haskovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Road transport – Tax provisions – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Penalties applicable to infringements of the national provisions adopted under that directive – Article 9a – Requirement of proportionality – National legislation penalising all offences by means of a flat-rate fine.#Case C-61/23.
junij 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0062: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Pedro Francisco v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 27 – Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health – Conduct representing a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society – Refusal to issue a temporary residence card of a family member of a Union citizen due to a police record – Unfavourable police report due to arrest.#Case C-62/23.