Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0036: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#L v Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Family benefits – Article 68 – Rules of priority in the case of overlapping of benefits – Obligation on the institution of the Member State having secondary competence to forward an application for family benefits to the institution of the Member State having primary competence – No application for family benefits in the child’s Member State of residence – Partial recovery of family benefits paid in the Member State of activity as an employed person of one of the parents.#Case C-36/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0036_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#L v Familienkasse Sachsen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Bremen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Family benefits – Article 68 – Rules of priority in the case of overlapping of benefits – Obligation on the institution of the Member State having secondary competence to forward an application for family benefits to the institution of the Member State having primary competence – No application for family benefits in the child’s Member State of residence – Partial recovery of family benefits paid in the Member State of activity as an employed person of one of the parents.#Case C-36/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0039: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0039_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Keva and Others v Skatteverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by pension funds governed by public law – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident pension funds governed by public law – Exemption only of resident pension funds governed by public law – Comparability of situations – Whether justified – Need to safeguard the objective pursued by social policy – Need to preserve a balanced allocation of the power of taxation of the Member States.#Case C-39/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0041: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2024.#AV and Others v Ministero della Giustizia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 2 and 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary members of the judiciary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to penalise improper use of fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Paid annual leave.#Case C-41/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0041_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2024.#AV and Others v Ministero della Giustizia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clauses 2 and 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary members of the judiciary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to penalise improper use of fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Paid annual leave.#Case C-41/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0044: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-44/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0044_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Combating terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(3), (4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Maintenance of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Applicability to situations of armed conflict – Terrorist group – Nature of, and underlying reasons for, the acts carried out – Distance in time – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-44/23 P.

RSS
First20032004200520062008201020112012Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top