september 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0063: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Sagrario and Others v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 16(3) – Refusal to renew the residence permit of the sponsor – Consequences – Refusal to renew the residence permit of the sponsor’s family members – Reason beyond their control – Presence of minor children – Article 15(3) – Conditions for granting an autonomous residence permit – Concept of ‘particularly difficult circumstances’ – Scope – Article 17 – Case-by-case examination – Right to be heard.#Case C-63/23.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0063_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Sagrario and Others v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 16(3) – Refusal to renew the residence permit of the sponsor – Consequences – Refusal to renew the residence permit of the sponsor’s family members – Reason beyond their control – Presence of minor children – Article 15(3) – Conditions for granting an autonomous residence permit – Concept of ‘particularly difficult circumstances’ – Scope – Article 17 – Case-by-case examination – Right to be heard.#C
december 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0065: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#MK v K GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6(1) and Article 9(1) and (2) of that regulation – Processing on the basis of a collective agreement – Margin of discretion of the parties to the collective agreement as regards the necessity of the processing of personal data provided for by that agreement – Scope of judicial review.#Case C-65/23.
september 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0066: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Elliniki Ornithologiki Etaireia and Others v Ypourgos Esoterikon and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Classification of a territory as a Special Protection Area – ‘Classification’ species – Temporary horizontal measures applied uniformly to all Special Protection Areas – Failure to adopt individualised management plans.#Case C-66/23.
september 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0066_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 September 2024.#Elliniki Ornithologiki Etaireia and Others v Ypourgos Esoterikon and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Classification of a territory as a Special Protection Area – ‘Classification’ species – Temporary horizontal measures applied uniformly to all Special Protection Areas – Failure to adopt individualised management plans.#Case C-66/23.
september 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0067: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#W. GmbH and Der Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof v S.Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar – Prohibition on the import of goods originating in or exported from Burma/Myanmar – Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 – Article 2(2)(a) – Teak logs originating in Burma/Myanmar exported to and processed in Taiwan before being transported to the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 24 – Concept of ‘substantial processing or working’ – Teak logs that have been debranched, debarked, sawn into the shape of wooden cuboids or cut into sawn teak wood in Taiwan – Certificate of origin issued by the
april 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0068: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#M-GbR v Finanzamt O.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 30a and 30b – Vouchers supplied electronically – Single-purpose and multi-purpose vouchers – Prepaid cards or voucher codes for the purchase of digital content, with a ‘country’ identifier making the digital content in question accessible only in the Member State in question.#Case C-68/23.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0068_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#M-GbR v Finanzamt O.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 30a and 30b – Vouchers supplied electronically – Single-purpose and multi-purpose vouchers – Prepaid cards or voucher codes for the purchase of digital content, with a ‘country’ identifier making the digital content in question accessible only in the Member State in question.#Case C-68/23.
julij 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0070: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Judgment annulling the decision in part and fixing a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine initially imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Decision of the European Commission on the outstanding balance of the fine – Due date for payment of a fine, the amount of which has been fixed by the EU judicature, in the exercise of its unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-70/23 P.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0071: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#French Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of scientific studies – Calculation of lung overload in particles – ‘Decisive’ nature of a scientific study – Distortion of the evidence – Error of law – Choice of calculation parameters – Particle density – Scientific assessment – Exceeding the limits of judicial review – Conce