Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0098:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 22 décembre 2022.#Eurelec Trading SCRL contre Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “matière civile et commerciale” – Action d’une autorité publique visant à faire constater, sanctionner et cesser des pratiques restrictives de concurrence.#Affaire C-98/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0099: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v OPEKEPE, Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 – Article 3(3) – Validity – Common organisation of the markets – Raw tobacco – Premiums granted to buyers of leaf tobacco – Reduction of those premiums according to the purchased quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality – Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-99/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0099_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#Kapniki A. Michailidis AE v Organismos Pliromon kai Elenchou Koinotikon Enischiseon Prosanatolismou kai Engyiseon (OPEKEPE) and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 2062/92 – Article 3(3) – Validity – Common organisation of the markets – Raw tobacco – Premiums granted to purchasers of leaf tobacco – Reduction of those premiums according to the quantity of tobacco of low class, category or quality purchased – Principles of non-retroactivity and of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-99/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0100:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 mai 2023.#KY contre Cour de justice de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Pension – Article 11, paragraphe 2, de l’annexe VIII de ce statut – Transfert de droits à pension nationaux au régime de pension des institutions de l’Union européenne – Bonification d’annuités – Article 2 de l’annexe VIII dudit statut – Calcul de la pension – Article 77, quatrième alinéa, du même statut – Règle du “minimum vital” – Demande de remboursement de la partie des droits à pension transférés non reflétée dans le montant de la pension de l’Union – Enrichissement sans cause.#Affaire C-100/22 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0101: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 May 2023.#European Commission v Sopra Steria Benelux.#Appeal – Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 169 – Appeal against the operative part of the decision of the General Court – Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Article 170(3) – Paragraph 23 of Annex I – Unsuccessful tenderer bringing to the European Commission’s attention evidence of the abnormally low nature of the successful tender – Scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons.#Case C-101/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0101_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 May 2023.#European Commission v Sopra Steria Benelux and Unisys Belgium.#Appeal – Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 169 – Appeal against the operative part of the decision of the General Court – Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Article 170(3) – Paragraph 23 of Annex I – Unsuccessful tenderer bringing to the European Commission’s attention evidence of the abnormally low nature of the successful tender – Scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons.#Case C-101/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0102: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#HC v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/363/18 – Notice of competition – Assessment by the selection board of the candidate’s answers to the ‘Talent Screener’ – Non-admission to the next stage of the competition – Rules on languages – Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English and French – Plea of illegality relating to the notice of competition – Inadmissibility.#Case C-102/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0102_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#HC v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/363/18 – Notice of competition – Assessment by the selection board of the candidate’s answers to the ‘Talent Screener’ – Non-admission to the next stage of the competition – Rules on languages – Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English and French – Plea of illegality relating to the notice of competition – Inadmissibility.#Case C-102/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0104: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Lännen MCE Oy v Berky GmbH and Senwatec Gmbh & Co. Kg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 125(5) – International jurisdiction – Infringement action – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the act of infringement has been committed or threatened – Advertising displayed by a search engine using a national top-level domain name – Advertising not specifying the geographical area of supply – Factors to be taken into account.#Case C-104/22.

RSS
First14841485148614871489149114921493Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top