Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0076: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#QI v Santander Bank Polska S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2014/17/EU – Credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property – Article 25(1) – Early repayment – Consumer’s right to a reduction in the total cost of the credit – Article 4(13) – Concept of ‘total cost of the credit to the consumer’ – Costs that are dependent of the duration of the contract – Commission for granting the credit payable when concluding the contract – Methodology for calculating the reduction.#Case C-76/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0078: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#ALD Automotive s.r.o. v DY, en qualité d'administrateur judiciaire de la société débitrice GEDEM-STAV a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payments in commercial transactions – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 as compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor – Late payment regarding contracts for successive performance – Fixed compensation due in respect of each late payment – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation of interpretation in compliance with EU law – General principles of national private law.#Case C-78/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0078_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#ALD Automotive s.r.o. v DY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrchní soud v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payments in commercial transactions – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 as compensation for the recovery costs incurred by the creditor – Late payment regarding contracts for successive performance – Fixed compensation due in respect of each late payment – Obligation to give full effect to EU law – Obligation of interpretation in compliance with EU law – General principles of national private law.#Case C-78/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0083: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#RTG v Tuk Tuk Travel S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 5 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Termination of a package travel contract – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic – Right to terminate the contract – Request for full refund – Information obligation on the travel organiser – Article 12 – Application of the principles of the delimitation of the subject matter of an action by the parties and of the correlation between the claims put forward in the action and the rulings contained in the operative part – Effective protection of the consumer – Examination of its own motion by the national court – Conditions.#Case C-83/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0083_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#RTG v Tuk Tuk Travel SL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 5 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Termination of a package travel contract – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – COVID-19 pandemic – Right to terminate the contract – Request for full refund – Information obligation on the travel organiser – Article 12 – Application in national law of the principles of the delimitation of the subject matter of an action by the parties and of the correlation between the claims put forward in the action and the rulings contained in the operative part – Effective protection of the consumer – Examination of its own motion by the national court – Condition

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0084: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Right to Know CLG v An Taoiseach.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – Refusal of a request for information – Records of government meetings – Discussions relating to greenhouse gas emissions – Article 4(1) and (2) – Exceptions to the right of access to information – Concepts of ‘internal communications’ and ‘proceedings of public authorities’ – Judicial review – Quashing of the decision refusing access – Applicable exception identified in the judgment – Res judicata.#Case C-84/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0084_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Right to Know CLG v An Taoiseach.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Public access to environmental information – Refusal of a request for information – Records of government meetings – Discussions relating to greenhouse gas emissions – Article 4(1) and (2) – Exceptions to the right of access to information – Concepts of ‘internal communications’ and ‘proceedings of public authorities’ – Judicial review – Quashing of the decision refusing access – Applicable exception identified in the judgment – Res judicata.#Case C-84/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0086:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 décembre 2023.#Papier Mettler Italia S.r.l. contre Ministero della Transizione Ecologica (già Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare) et Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Environnement – Directive 94/62/CE – Emballages et déchets d’emballages – Directive 98/34/CE – Procédure d’information dans le domaine des normes et réglementations techniques et des règles relatives aux services de la société de l’information – Obligation des États membres de notifier à la Commission européenne tout projet de règle technique – Réglementation nationale prévoyant des règles techniques plus restrictives que celles prévues par la réglementation de l’Union

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First14821483148414851487148914901491Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top