Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0104_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#Lännen MCE Oy v Berky GmbH and Senwatec Gmbh & Co. Kg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 125(5) – International jurisdiction – Infringement action – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the act of infringement has been committed or threatened – Advertising displayed by a search engine using a national top-level domain name – Advertising not specifying the geographical area of supply – Factors to be taken into account.#Case C-104/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0105: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#P.M. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Tax provisions – Article 110 TFEU – Excise duty – Export of a vehicle registered in a Member State to a country of the European Economic Area (EEA) – Refusal to reimburse the excise duty paid in respect of that vehicle up to an amount proportionate to the duration of its use in the territory of the Member State of registration – Principle that excise duty is a single-stage tax and principle of proportionality.#Case C-105/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0105_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#P.M. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Tax provisions – Article 110 TFEU – Excise duty – Export of a vehicle registered in a Member State to a country of the European Economic Area (EEA) – Refusal to reimburse the excise duty paid in respect of that vehicle up to an amount proportionate to the duration of its use in the territory of the Member State of registration – Principle that excise duty is a single-stage tax and principle of proportionality.#Case C-105/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0106: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#Xella Magyarország Építőanyagipari Kft. v Innovációs és Technológiai Miniszter.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Freedom of establishment – Regulation (EU) 2019/452 – Legislation of a Member State establishing a mechanism for filtering foreign investment in resident companies considered to be ‘strategic’ – Decision adopted on the basis of that legislation, prohibiting the acquisition by a resident company of all the shares of another resident company – Acquired company considered to be ‘strategic’ on the ground that its primary activity concerns the extraction of certain raw materials such as gravel, sand and clay – Acquiring company considered to be a ‘foreign investor’ on the ground

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0106_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#Xella Magyarország Építőanyagipari Kft. v Innovációs és Technológiai Miniszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Freedom of establishment – Regulation (EU) 2019/452 – Legislation of a Member State establishing a mechanism for filtering foreign investment in resident companies considered to be ‘strategic’ – Decision adopted on the basis of that legislation, prohibiting the acquisition by a resident company of all the shares of another resident company – Acquired company considered to be ‘strategic’ on the ground that its primary activity concerns the extraction of certain raw materials such as gravel, sand and clay – Ac

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0109:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 14 décembre 2023.#Commission européenne contre Roumanie.#Environnement – Directive 1999/31/CE – Mise en décharge des déchets – Obligation de désaffecter les décharges n’ayant pas obtenu l’autorisation requise – Procédure de désaffectation – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Inexécution – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Sanctions pécuniaires – Astreinte – Somme forfaitaire.#Affaire C-109/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0111:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 janvier 2024.#Helene Hamers contre Centre européen pour le développement de la formation professionnelle.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaire – Enquête de l’Office européen de lutte antifraude (OLAF) – Procédure pénale nationale – Décision nationale acquittant la requérante – Préjudices prétendument subis en raison du comportement illégal du Centre européen pour le développement de la formation professionnelle (Cedefop) au cours de la procédure pénale nationale – Rejet de la demande indemnitaire introduite par la requérante – Recours en annulation et en indemnité – Article 41, paragraphe 1, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Exigence d’impartialité – Conflit d’intérêts – Article 48, pa

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First14851486148714881490149214931494Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top