Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0119: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Teva BV and Teva Finland Oy v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, anciennement Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for obtaining an SPC for medicinal products – Article 3(a) – Concept of ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ – Article 3(c) – Concept of ‘product the subject of an SPC’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-119/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0119_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Teva BV and Teva Finland Oy v Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC v Clonmel Healthcare Limited.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus and the Supreme Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 – Conditions for obtaining an SPC for medicinal products – Article 3(a) – Concept of ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ – Article 3(c) – Concept of ‘product the subject of an SPC’ – Criteria for assessment.#Joined Cases C-119/22 and C-149/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0122: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0122_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Dyson Ltd and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Energy – Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Delegated regulation of the European Commission supplementing that directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Annulment – Actions for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Requirement of a sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Manifest and grave disregard for the limits of discretion – Relevant factors in the case of the absence of any discretion.#Case C-122/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0123: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directives 2008/115/EC, 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU – Procedure for granting international protection – Effective access – Border procedure – Procedural safeguards – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Appeals brought against administrative decisions rejecting an application for international protection – Right to remain in the territory – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Non-compliance – Article 260(2) TFEU – Financial penalties – Proportionality and dissuasiveness – Lump sum – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-123/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0123_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directives 2008/115/EC, 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU – Procedure for granting international protection – Effective access – Border procedure – Procedural safeguards – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Appeals brought against administrative decisions rejecting an application for international protection – Right to remain in the territory – Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Non-compliance – Article 260(2) TFEU – Financial penalties – Proportionality and dissuasiveness – Lump sum – Periodic penalty payment.#Case C-123/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0124:           Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 14 septembre 2023.##Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union européenne – Contrats de subvention conclus dans le cadre de divers programmes européens – Arrêts du Tribunal de l’Union européenne constatant la violation de stipulations contractuelles par la société bénéficiaire – Société civile de droit grec – Société placée en liquidation – Exécution forcée devant les juridictions nationales, à la charge des associés de la société bénéficiaire, des arrêts du Tribunal ordonnant le recouvrement des subventions – Allégations prétendument mensongères formulées par la Commission européenne dans le cadre de la procédure nationale – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit ayant pour objet de conférer d

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0124_INF:           Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 14 septembre 2023.#Zoi Apostolopoulou et Anastasia Apostolopoulou-Chrysanthaki contre Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle de l’Union européenne – Contrats de subvention conclus dans le cadre de divers programmes européens – Arrêts du Tribunal de l’Union européenne constatant la violation de stipulations contractuelles par la société bénéficiaire – Société civile de droit grec – Société placée en liquidation – Exécution forcée devant les juridictions nationales, à la charge des associés de la société bénéficiaire, des arrêts du Tribunal ordonnant le recouvrement des subventions – Allégations prétendument mensongères formulées par la Commission européenne dans le cadre de la procédure nationale –

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0125: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#X and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 15 – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Taking into account of factors relating to the applicant’s individual position and personal circumstances and to the general situation in the country of origin – Humanitarian situation.#Case C-125/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0125_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#X and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 15 – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Taking into account of factors relating to the applicant’s individual position and personal circumstances and to the general situation in the country of origin – Humanitarian situation.#Case C-125/22.

RSS
First14871488148914901492149414951496Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top