september 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0048_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024.#Google LLC and Alphabet Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Markets for online general search services and specialised product search services – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Leveraging abuse – Competition on the merits or anticompetitive practice – Dominant undertaking favouring the display of results from its own specialised search service – Potential anticompetitive effects – Causal link between abuse and effects – Burden of proof – Counterfactual scenario – Capability of foreclosing – ‘As-efficient competitor’ test.#Case C-48/22 P.
junij 08, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0049: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG v TW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(a) – Cancellation of a flight – Article 8(1) – Obligation to provide assistance – Concept of ‘re-routing’ – Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight – COVID‑19 pandemic – Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance – Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight – Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight.#Case C-49/22.
marec 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0049_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Austrian Airlines AG v TW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1)(a) – Cancellation of a flight – Article 8(1) – Obligation to provide assistance – Concept of ‘re-routing’ – Compensation for air passengers in the event of cancellation of a flight – COVID‑19 pandemic – Repatriation flight organised by a Member State in the context of consular assistance – Flight operated by the same operating air carrier and at the same time as the cancelled flight – Costs to be borne by the passenger in excess of the net costs of that flight.#Case C-49/22.
marec 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0050: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Sogefinancement v RW and UV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2008/48/EC – Credit agreements for consumers – Scope – Right of withdrawal – Article 14(7) – National provisions establishing a period of time during which the performance of the contract may not begin – National procedural rules governing how the national courts raise of their own motion and penalise breaches of those provisions – Article 23 – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.#Case C-50/22.
april 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0052: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#BF v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Article 2(1) and (2)(a) – Article 6(1) – Retirement pension – National legislation providing for a gradual alignment of the pension scheme for civil servants with the general pension scheme – First adjustment of the amount of the pension being made more quickly for one category of civil servants than for another – Justification.#Case C-52/22.
marec 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0052_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#BF v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Article 2(1) and (2)(a) – Article 6(1) – Retirement pension – National legislation providing for a gradual alignment of the pension scheme for civil servants with the general pension scheme – First adjustment of the amount of the pension being made more quickly for one category of civil servants than for another – Justification.#Case C-52/22.
februar 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0053: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2023.#VZ v CA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(3) – Interest in bringing proceedings – Access to the review procedures – Grave professional misconduct on account of an anticompetitive agreement – Other operator definitively excluded from participating in the procurement procedure concerned due to failure to meet the minimum requirements.#Case C-53/22.
februar 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0054: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Citizens’ Initiative – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative – Article 4(2)(b) – Proposed citizens’ initiative not falling manifestly outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the European Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Burden of proof – Power of the Commission to proceed with partial registration.#Case C-54/22 P.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0054_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – European Citizens’ Initiative – Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Registration of a proposed citizens’ initiative – Article 4(2)(b) – Proposed citizens’ initiative not falling manifestly outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the European Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Burden of proof – Power of the Commission to proceed with partial registration.#Case C-54/22 P.
september 14, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0055: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#NK v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Feldkirch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Final termination of a first set of proceedings brought for an infringement of a provision of national legislation on games of chance – Administrative penalty of a criminal nature imposed for the same acts for an infringement of a different provision of that legislation – First set of proceedings terminated on account of an incorrect legal classification of the offence committed.#Case C-55/22.