Admin MPS / sreda, 08. junij 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021TO0459: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-459/21. CELEX:62021TO0449_RES: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#Natixis v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Preliminary issue – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise solely before the courts or tribunals of the United Kingdom in one of the situations exhaustively provided for by Article 91(2) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and from Euratom – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before the courts or tribunals of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-449/21. CELEX:62021TO0459_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-459/21. Print 169 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62024CJ0603: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Stellantis Portugal SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Point 1 of Article 2 – Liability to VAT – Supply of services effected for consideration – Criteria – Intra-group relationships – Adjustments of the transfer prices of motor vehicles between manufacturers and distributors – Account taken of the after-sales costs of repair of those vehicles incurred by the distributors – Existence of a direct link between the supply of services and the consideration actually received – Existence of a legal relationship pursuant to which there is reciprocal performance.#Case C-603/24. CELEX:62025TC0366: Opinion of Advocate General Martín y Pérez de Nanclares delivered on 13 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CC0227: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 13 May 2026.### CELEX:62025CJ0322: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#SWEDISH MATCH – FÓSFOROS DE PORTUGAL, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – General arrangements for products subject to excise duty – Directive 92/12/EEC – Tax markings – Article 21 – National legislation limiting the automatic justification of the destruction of 2% of the tax markings used annually during the production process to the destruction which occurred on the national territory – Proportionality.#Case C-322/25. CELEX:62025CJ0286: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#BRANDL Mezőgazdasági, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Agrárminisztérium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Cancellation, by operation of law, of rights of usufruct over properties contrary to Article 63 TFEU and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restoration of those rights following a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Compensation for the damage suffered – National rules providing for financial compensation calculated solely on the basis of the market value of those properties at the time of deletion of the rights of usufruct – Requirement of adequate compensation for the damage suffe CELEX:62020TJ0522(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV. CELEX:62024CJ0576_INF: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 16 octobre 2025.#TO contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour l’asile (AUEA).#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Résiliation du contrat – Rupture du lien de confiance – Harcèlement moral.#Affaire C-576/24 P. CELEX:62025CJ0225: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25. CELEX:62024CJ0877: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#X and Minister van Asiel en Migratie, anciennement Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v Y.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Articles 6, 8 and 9 – Illegally staying third-country nationals imprisoned for a long term or for life – Possibility of adopting a return decision – Procedural safeguards.#Case C-877/24. CELEX:62025TJ0286: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in response to the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in Russia’s aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Error of assessment.#Case T-286/25. CELEX:62025TO0671: Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 11 mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Fonds publics pour le développement de réseaux à haut débit – Plainte – Examen préliminaire d’une prétendue aide d’État illégale – Lettre d’information – Article 24, paragraphe 2, du règlement (UE) 2015/1589 – Acte préparatoire – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-671/25. CELEX:62025TJ0150: Urteil des Gerichts (Fünfte erweiterte Kammer) vom 13. Mai 2026.#Zollamt Österreich gegen G GmbH.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Zollunion – Zollkodex der Union – Recht zur Einlegung eines Rechtsbehelfs – Art. 44 Abs. 4 der Verordnung Nr. 952/2013 – Entscheidung über eine verbindliche Zolltarifauskunft – Gerichtlicher Rechtsbehelf – Berichtigung – Rückwirkung.#Rechtssache T-150/25. CELEX:62025TJ0105: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Kutxabank, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark K. – Earlier EU figurative marks k and k kutxabank kredit – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Lack of similarity of the services – Lack of similarity of the signs – Cross-claim.#Case T-105/25. CELEX:62025TJ0390: Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Ixo Restauración, SL contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#* Langue de procédure : l’espagnol. Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne figurative MUKA – Marque nationale verbale antérieure LAMUCCA – Cause de nullité relative – Risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Usage sérieux de la marque antérieure – Article 64, paragraphes 2 et 3, du règlement 2017/1001 – Proportionnalité – Obligation de motivation».#Affaire T-390/25. CELEX:62024TJ0593: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 13 mai 2026.#Brucella Green Vac, SL contre Commission européenne.#Recherche et développement technologique – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” (2014-2020) – Recouvrement des sommes indûment versées au titre d’une convention de subvention – Résiliation de la convention – Décision formant titre exécutoire – Article 299 TFUE – Principe de bonne administration – Confiance légitime – Proportionnalité – Règlement (UE, Euratom) 2018/1046.#Affaire T-593/24. CELEX:62024CJ0488_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#D.V. v MB „Kigas“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 5(1)(a) and (c) – Information requirements for contracts other than distance or off-premises contracts – Obligation on the trader to inform the consumer of the main characteristics of the service – Customs duties – Obligation on the trader to inform the consumer of the total price of the service – Additional charges – Content of the information to be provided to the consumer – Convention on the Contract for the International Carriage of Goods by Road (CMR) – Articles 6 and 11.#Case C-488/24. CELEX:62025TJ0024: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Les Éditions Albert René v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Obelix – Earlier EU word mark OBELIX – Relative ground for invalidity – Reputation of the earlier mark – Link between the marks at issue – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-24/25. CELEX:62020TJ0522(01): Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 13 May 2026.#Carpatair SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Measures implemented by Romania in favour of Timișoara Airport – Measures implemented by Timișoara Airport in favour of Wizz Air and airlines using that airport – Decision finding, in part, that there was no State aid in favour of Timișoara Airport and airlines using that airport – Airport charges – Action for annulment – Standing to bring proceedings – Individual concern – No substantial effect on the competitive position – Partial inadmissibility – Article 107(1) TFEU – Error of law – Selective nature – Advantage.#Case T-522/20 RENV. CELEX:62025CO0526_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026.#XV v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Steyr.#Case C-526/25. CELEX:62025TO0548: Beschluss des Gerichts (Fünfte Kammer) vom 11. Mai 2026.#TNG Stadtnetz GmbH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Untätigkeitsklage – Staatliche Beihilfen – Öffentliche Mittel für den Ausbau von Breitbandnetzen – Beschwerde – Vorläufige Prüfung einer mutmaßlichen rechtswidrigen staatlichen Beihilfe – Unterrichtungsschreiben – Art. 24 Abs. 2 der Verordnung (EU) 2015/1589 – Stellungnahme der Kommission – Unzulässigkeit.#Rechtssache T-548/25. Comments are only visible to subscribers.