Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0038: Case T-38/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Inivos and Inivos v Commission (Public procurement — Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice — Supply of disinfection robots to European hospitals — Extreme urgency — COVID-19 — Non-participation of the applicants in the tendering procedure — Action for annulment — Lack of individual concern — Contractual nature of the dispute — Inadmissibility — Liability)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0039: Case T-39/21: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — PP and Others v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Health crisis linked to the COVID-19 pandemic — Decision authorising part-time work in order to take care of relatives outside the place of employment — No possibility of teleworking full time outside the place of employment — Irregularity in the pre-litigation procedure — Decision granting a request to work part time — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility — Remuneration — Suspension of the expatriation allowance — Articles 62 and 69 of the Staff Regulations — Infringement of Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0053: Case T-53/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — EVH v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Undertakings — Duty of diligence)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0054: Case T–54/21: Judgment of the General Court of 26 April 2023 — OHB System v Commission (Public supply contracts — Tendering procedure — Competitive dialogue — Procurement of Galileo transition satellites — Rejection of a tenderer’s tender — Exclusion criteria — Serious professional misconduct on the part of a tenderer — No final judgment or final administrative decision — Referral to the panel referred to in Article 143 of the Financial Regulation — Equal treatment — Abnormally low tender — Manifest error of assessment)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0055: Case T-55/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Stadtwerke Leipzig v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Undertakings — Duty of diligence)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0056: Case T-56/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — TEAG v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Undertakings — Duty of diligence)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0058: Case T-58/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Undertakings — Duty of diligence)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0059: Case T-59/21: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — eins energie in sachsen v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — German electricity and gas markets — Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of ‘single concentration’ — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to be heard — Definition of the market — Period of analysis — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Manifest errors of assessment — Undertakings — Duty of diligence)

RSS
First12111212121312141216121812191220Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top