maj 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0744_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#Henry Cotton's Brand Management Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-744/21 P.
september 23, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0749: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 15 septembre 2022.#Coordination nationale médicale santé - environnement (CNMSE) e.a. contre Parlement européen et Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Règlement (UE) 2020/1043 – Convention d’Aarhus – Article 2, paragraphe 2, premier alinéa, sous d), et second alinéa – Règlement (CE) nº 1367/2006 – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Recours en annulation – Article 263, quatrième alinéa, TFUE – Associations ayant pour objet la protection de la santé humaine et de l’environnement – Absence de qualité pour agir – Personne non concernée individuellement – Irrecevabilité du recours – Pourvoi, en partie, manifestement irrecevable et, en partie, manifestement non fondé. This document does not exist in English.
marec 01, 2023 0 17 CELEX:62021CO0749_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Coordination nationale médicale santé - environnement (CNMSE) and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Case C-749/21 P.
oktober 11, 2023 0 54 CELEX:62021CO0757: Rectification order of 3 October 2023.#Nichicon Corporation v European Commission.#Rectification of judgment.#Case C-757/21 P.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0761: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.
maj 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0761_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-761/21 P.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0762: Order of the Court of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.
maj 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0762_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 31 March 2022.#St. Hippolyt Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-762/21 P.
maj 30, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0764: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Zehnte Kammer) vom 19. Mai 2022.#TUIfly GmbH gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Art. 181 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Zugang zu Dokumenten – Dokumente eines Verfahrens zur Kontrolle staatlicher Beihilfen – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1049/2001 – Art. 4 Abs. 2 a. E. – Ausnahmen vom Zugangsrecht – Überwiegendes öffentliches Interesse – Begriff – Grundsatz der guten Verwaltung – Art. 41 Abs. 2 Buchst. b der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Verteidigungsrechte – Spezifische Ziele des Verfahrens zur Kontrolle staatlicher Beihilfen – Verweigerung des Zugangs – Teils offensichtlich unzulässiges und teils offensichtlich unbegründetes Rechtsmittel.#Rechtssache C-764/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 11, 2022 0 178 CELEX:62021CO0764_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#TUIfly GmbH v European Commission.#Case C-764/21 P.