Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0095: Case T-95/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2022 — Portugal v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid — Madeira Free Zone — Aid scheme implemented by Portugal — Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme — Concept of State aid — Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of sound administration — Absolute impossibility of implementation — Limitation — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0100: Case T-100/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — Sánchez-Gavito León v Council and Commission (International Cotton Advisory Committee — Decision (EU) 2017/876 — Staff of an international organisation to which the European Union has acceded — Agreement on the applicant’s conditions of departure — Actions for failure to act — Absence in part of invitation to act — No standing to bring proceedings — Inadmissibility — Liability — Causal link)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0103: Case T-103/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0104: Case T-104/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kande Mupompa v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0105: Case T-105/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0106: Case T-106/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Kazembe Musonda v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62021TA0107: Case T-107/21: Judgment of the General Court of 27 April 2022 — Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures)

RSS
First12141215121612171219122112221223Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top