junij 25, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0868: Order of the Court of 30 April 2026.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-868/25 P.
julij 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0872: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0874: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0875: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P.
maj 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0883: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 4 mai 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt contre Royaume d'Espagne.#Recours introduit par une personne physique contre un État membre – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-883/25. This document does not exist in English.
januar 26, 2026 0 25 CELEX:62025CU0001: Opinion 1/25: Request for an opinion submitted by the European Commission pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU
januar 26, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0003: Case T-3/25: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Zündapp v EUIPO – Longines (Representation of a stylised shield with horizontal bars) (EU trade mark–Opposition proceedings–Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars–International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle–Relative ground for refusal–No likelihood of confusion–Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001–Similarity of the signs at issue)
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0006: Case T-6/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2026 – QI v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Article 12(a) of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal of request – Substantial new facts that may justify the submission of a request for reconsideration of a previous decision – Prima facie evidence of the alleged psychological harassment – Liability)
april 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0007: Case T-7/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 March 2026 – Puppan v Parliament (Civil service – Officials – Appraisal – 2023 appraisal exercise – Staff report – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing an action – Inadmissibility – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Award of merit points – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Liability)
marec 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025TA0009: Case T-9/25: Judgment of the Court of 14 January 2026 – KCT v EUIPO (Movement of a folding window) (EU trade mark – Application for a European Union trade mark consisting of the movement of a folding window – Absolute ground for refusal – Sign consisting exclusively of a feature of the goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)