maj 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0582: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Representation of non-privileged parties in an action before the Courts of the European Union – Third and fourth paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Requirement to be represented by a lawyer – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-582/25 P.
julij 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0582_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Representation of non-privileged parties in an action before the Courts of the European Union – Third and fourth paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Requirement to be represented by a lawyer – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-582/25 P.
marec 31, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0589: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 23 mars 2026.#Ministero dell'Interno et Questura Ragusa contre TV, agissant en tant que représentant légal de 23 PLAY srls.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Article 49 TFUE – Liberté d’établissement – Article 56 TFUE – Libre prestation des services – Restrictions – Jeux de hasard – Collecte et gestion de paris – Conditions d’autorisation – Législation nationale subordonnant l’exercice de l’activité de collecte de paris à l’obtention d’une autorisation de police et d’une concession – Raisons impérieuses d’intérêt général – Lutte contre la criminalité organisée dans le secteur des jeux de hasard.#Affaire C-589/25. This document does not exist in English.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0589_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ministero dell'Interno and Questura Ragusa v TV en tant que représentant légal de 23 PLAY srls.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana.#Case C-589/25.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0590: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 October 2025.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Actions for damages – Request for the initiation of infringement proceedings against the Kingdom of Sweden – Decision of the European Commission rejecting that request – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-590/25 P(R).
april 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0590_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 October 2025.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Actions for damages – Request for the initiation of infringement proceedings against the Kingdom of Sweden – Decision of the European Commission rejecting that request – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-590/25 P(R).
april 01, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0593: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. contre Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 2003/96/CE – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Article 21, paragraphe 5 – Droits d’accise perçus par un État membre en violation du droit de l’Union – Droit du producteur d’électricité au remboursement du trop-perçu – Pratique jurisprudentielle subordonnant le droit au remboursement à la démonstration d’un préjudice patrimonial – Enrichissement sans cause – Principe d’effectivité du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-593/25. This document does not exist in English.
april 08, 2026 0 8 CELEX:62025CO0593_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Case C-593/25.
januar 26, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0597: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0597_INF: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.