Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0017: Case T-17/25: Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2026 – Team Beverage v EUIPO – Zurich Deutscher Herold Lebensversicherung (TEAM BEVERAGE) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – EU figurative mark TEAM BEVERAGE – Earlier EU word mark TEAM – Request for suspension of the administrative proceedings – Rejection – Article 71(1)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0023: Case T-23/25: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – HH v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Notice of competition – Open competition EPSO/AD/400/22 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Stability of the composition of the selection board – Obligation to state reasons)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0034: Case T-34/25: Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2025 – Centex v EUIPO – Adler Modemärkte (OWN) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0043: Case T-43/25: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2026 – Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Representation of a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle – Earlier EU figurative marks representing one or more white curved stripes ascending to the right – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62025TA0054: Case T-54/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – Maschio Gaspardo v EUIPO – Madara Agro (Agricultural machines) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing an agricultural subsoiler – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression)

RSS
First30483049305030513053305530563057Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top