april 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0132: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case.#Case C-132/25.
julij 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0132_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#M.M. Ristorazione Srl v Villa Ramazzini Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Directive 2004/48/EC – Enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 9(5) – Provisional measures – Failure to institute proceedings leading to a decision on the merits of the case – National legislation providing for the continuation of the effects of provisional measures intended to anticipate the effects of a decision on the merits of the case.#Case C-132/25.
julij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0133: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0135_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#Criminal proceedings against Varhovna kasatsionna prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgarie).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial and the consequences of non-appearance – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding reasonable efforts made by the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a decision in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial or to another legal remedy which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the
september 18, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0139: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#Administración General del Estado v Ishares Europe EFT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by an investment fund – Tax rate – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident investment funds – Bilateral tax convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Neutralisation of a possible restriction on the free movement of capital by means of the convention.#Case C-139/25.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0139_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#Administración General del Estado v Ishares Europe EFT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation of dividends received by an investment fund – Tax rate – Difference in treatment between resident and non-resident investment funds – Bilateral tax convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Neutralisation of a possible restriction on the free movement of capital by means of the convention.#Case C-139/25.
september 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0147: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#« Inter Rao Lietuva » AB v Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – National measure providing for the freezing of funds and economic resources belonging to a legal person owing to the existence of links with a person sanctioned by the European Union – Principle of good administration – Right to effective legal protection – Scope of judicial review – Standard of proof o
september 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0147_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#« Inter Rao Lietuva » AB v Finansinių nusikaltimų tyrimo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2(1) – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1) – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – National measure providing for the freezing of funds and economic resources belonging to a legal person owing to the existence of links with a person sanctioned by the European Union – Principle of good administration – Right to effective legal protection – Scope of judicial review – Standard of pro
marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0150: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#BX v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Income tax – Employment income received in another Member State – Exemption with progression in the Member State of residence – Failure to apply a bilateral convention for the avoidance of double taxation by a contracting State – Loss of part of the tax advantages relating to the personal and family circumstances of the taxpayer.#Case C-150/25.
marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0150_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#BX contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 45 TFUE – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Impôt sur le revenu – Revenus professionnels perçus dans un autre État membre – Exonération avec réserve de progressivité dans l’État membre de résidence – Inapplication par cet État d’une convention bilatérale visant à éviter les doubles impositions – Perte d’une partie des avantages fiscaux liés à la situation personnelle et familiale du contribuable.#Affaire C-150/25. This document does not exist in English.