marec 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0586: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 3 mars 2025.#I.G. et D.L.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 267 TFUE – Notion de “juridiction” – Juge de la chambre civile du Sąd Najwyższy (Cour suprême, Pologne) – Juge nommé par le président de la République de Pologne sur la base d’une résolution émanant de la Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (Conseil national de la magistrature, Pologne) dans sa nouvelle composition – Renvoi préjudiciel émanant d’une formation de jugement n’ayant pas la qualité de tribunal indépendant et impartial, établi préalablement par la loi – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-586/24. This document does not exist in English.
september 15, 2025 0 17 CELEX:62024CO0586_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2025.#I.G. and D.L.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Joined Cases C-586/24 and C-605/24.
oktober 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0599: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Accord Healthcare, SL v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Public health – Medicinal product for human use – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Degarelix Accord – Action for annulment – Time limits – Force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances – Dismissal.#Case C-599/24 P(I).
januar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0599_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Accord Healthcare, SL v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Public health – Medicinal product for human use – Decision granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Degarelix Accord – Action for annulment – Time limits – Force majeure or unforeseeable circumstances – Dismissal.#Case C-599/24 P(I).
februar 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0607: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.
avgust 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0607_INF: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.
februar 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0608: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.
avgust 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0608_INF: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.
februar 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0614: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#RS v European Investment Bank.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff member of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Non-conversion of a fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-614/24 P.
julij 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0614_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#RS v European Investment Bank.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff member of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Non-conversion of a fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-614/24 P.