marec 22, 2025 0 22 CELEX:62024TJ0172: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#Asaş Alüminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-172/24.
september 26, 2025 0 18 CELEX:62024TJ0172_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 March 2025.#Asaş Alüminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-172/24.
november 22, 2025 0 16 CELEX:62024TJ0173: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#DI v European Parliament.#Case T-173/24.
april 16, 2026 0 12 CELEX:62024TJ0173_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#DI v European Parliament.#Case T-173/24.
januar 21, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0174: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Djchem Chemicals Poland S.A. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-174/24.
januar 21, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0174_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Djchem Chemicals Poland S.A. and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and certain mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of 1,4-Benzenediamine, N,N’-mixed Ph and tolyl derivs. – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity category 1B – Multi-constituent substance – Relevance of adverse effects in humans – Read-across – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-174/24.
januar 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0176: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality – F
februar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0176_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Feras Al Akhras v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – ‘Family membership’ criterion – Criterion of ‘association with members of the Assad or Makhlouf families’ – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Communication of the restrictive measures – Error of assessment – Proportionality
julij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0180: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#DO v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Remuneration – Parental leave – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – First paragraph of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation – Tax rate – Assessment of tax.#Case T-180/24.
julij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0180_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#DO v European Central Bank.#Civil service – ECB staff – Remuneration – Parental leave – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – First paragraph of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Literal, contextual and teleological interpretation – Tax rate – Assessment of tax.#Case T-180/24.