april 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0154_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#AF v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Reports procedure – Appraisal report – 2022 appraisal exercise – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-154/24.
december 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0157: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2024.#Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CHIPSY KINGS – International registration of the earlier word mark Curry King – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-157/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0158: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Piql AS v European Commission.#Grant agreement signed as part of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Ultra-secure data storage and long-term preservation of digital and analogue data – Decision to recover part of the grant – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Article 110 of the EEA Agreement – Eligible costs – Article 122(2)(b) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 – Article 23(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Concepts of ‘linked third parties’ and ‘affiliated entities’ – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-158/24.
marec 10, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0158_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Piql AS v European Commission.#Grant agreement signed as part of the ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Ultra-secure data storage and long-term preservation of digital and analogue data – Decision to recover part of the grant – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Article 110 of the EEA Agreement – Eligible costs – Article 122(2)(b) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 – Article 23(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Concepts of ‘linked third parties’ and ‘affiliated entities’ – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-158/24.
september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0159: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Western Australian Agriculture Authority (WAAA) v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for apple varieties Cripps Pink and Cripps Red – Nullity proceedings – Article 53a of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 – Serious doubts – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Novelty.#Case T-159/24.
februar 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0159_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Western Australian Agriculture Authority (WAAA) v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Application for a Community plant variety right for apple varieties Cripps Pink and Cripps Red – Nullity proceedings – Article 53a of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 – Serious doubts – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Novelty.#Case T-159/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0161: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#NTT Data Belgique and Others v European Investment Bank.#Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – IT Consultancy for EIB-specific Applications – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-161/24.
julij 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0161_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#NTT Data Belgique and Others v European Investment Bank.#Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – IT Consultancy for EIB-specific Applications – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-161/24.
januar 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0163: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.
junij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0163_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 January 2025.#Rat Pack Filmproduktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark RATPAC – Earlier national word mark RAT PACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-163/24.