Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0617: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Siegfried PharmaChemikalien Minden GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 24(d) and Article 211(2) – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Power to ‘supplement’ a legislative act – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 172(1) and (2) – Validity – Retroactive effect of an inward processing authorisation.#Case C-617/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0617_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Siegfried PharmaChemikalien Minden GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 24(d) and Article 211(2) – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Power to ‘supplement’ a legislative act – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 172(1) and (2) – Validity – Retroactive effect of an inward processing authorisation.#Case C-617/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0618: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#XK and Others v SM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Articles 1, 3 and 4 – Scope – Concept of ‘succession’ – Statutory legacy conferred for services provided by a carer for the deceased during the latter’s lifetime – General jurisdiction of a court of a Member State to rule on the succession as a whole.#Case C-618/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0618_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 26 mars 2026.#XK e.a. contre SM.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 650/2012 – Articles 1er, 3 et 4 – Champ d’application – Notion de “succession” – Legs légal conféré au titre du soutien apporté par l’aidant au défunt lors du vivant de ce dernier – Compétence générale d’une juridiction d’un État membre pour statuer sur l’ensemble d’une succession.#Affaire C-618/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0619: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#JG v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 3i(1) and (3ad) – Annex XXI – Prohibition on importing goods generating significant revenues for the Russian Federation into the European Union – Importation of a vehicle.#Case C-619/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0621: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 2(g) – Material reception conditions – Article 17(2) – Requirement as to a guaranteed adequate standard of living – Applicant for international protection subject to a transfer decision – Provision of the material reception conditions excluding benefits in kind covering clothing, everyday items and consumables, and without payment of the financial allowance intended to cover basic personal needs – Article 20(1)(c) – Reduction or withdrawal of material rece

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0623: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2026.#UJ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil Service – Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of international cooperation and managing aid to non-EU countries – Repetition of written tests – Decision not to include the appellants’ names on the reserve list – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the judicial action – Action for annulment.#Case C-623/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0626: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#PRAGON s.r.o. v Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce, Inspektorát v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Official controls on foodstuffs – Regulation (EU) 2017/625 – Article 9(7) – Exhaustive harmonisation – National legislation providing for an obligation to notify the arrival of food supplements from other Member States – Condition of strict necessity for the effective organisation of official controls in the light of imperatives relating to the protection of human health and consumers.#Case C-626/24.

RSS
First26222623262426252627262926302631Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top