oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0501_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Klinka-Geo Trans Földmunkavégző Ipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Case C-501/24.
oktober 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0502: Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-502/24 P.
januar 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0502_INF: Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-502/24 P.
oktober 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0503: Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-503/24 P.
januar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0503_INF: Order of the Court of 4 October 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-503/24 P.
september 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0504: Ordonnance de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 septembre 2024.##Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Article 1er, paragraphe 3 – Article 4 bis – Procédure de remise entre États membres – Motifs de non-exécution facultative – Article 48, paragraphe 2, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droits de la défense – Directive 2012/13/UE – Article 6 – Droit à l’information dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Directive 2013/48/UE – Article 3 – Droit d’accès à un avocat dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Décision rendue à l’issue d’un procès sans comparution de la personne This document does not exist in English.
september 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0511: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 September 2024.#Aylo Freesites LTD v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate as a very large online platform – Action for annulment – Balancing of competing interests.#Case C-511/24 P(R).
februar 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0511_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 September 2024.#Aylo Freesites LTD v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Additional online advertising transparency – Decision to designate as a very large online platform – Action for annulment – Balancing of competing interests.#Case C-511/24 P(R).
marec 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0517(01): Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 26 février 2026.#VG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – État de droit – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Protection juridictionnelle effective dans les domaines couverts par le droit de l’Union – Indépendance des juges – Izba Odpowiedzialności Zawodowej (chambre de la responsabilité professionnelle) du Sąd Najwyższy (Cour suprême, Pologne) – Possibilité de remettre en cause une condamnation disciplinaire définitive au stade d’une procédure de globalisation des peines – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-517/24. This document does not exist in English.
december 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0520: Order of the Court of 19 November 2024.#Jaw de Croon Holding BV v Community Plant Variety Office.#Appeal – Community plant variety rights – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal not demonstrating the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-520/24 P.