maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0557: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 21 mai 2026.#Malacalza Investimenti Srl et Vittorio Malacalza contre Banque centrale européenne.#Pourvoi – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Politique économique et monétaire – Surveillance prudentielle des établissements de crédit – Décisions prises par la Banque centrale européenne (BCE) concernant Banca Carige SpA – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers – Principe de protection de la confiance légitime – Conflit d’intérêts – Proportionnalité – Égalité de traitement – Droit de propriété – Motivation de l’arrêt du Tribunal.#Affaire C-557/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0558: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik AS v Myflyright GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Landshut.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 6 – Concept of ‘delay of a flight’ – Postponement of a flight announced in advance by the air carrier with confirmation of the new departure and arrival times – Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7(1) – Right to compensation for passengers in the event of delays of three hours or more in the arrival of the flight – Concept of ‘scheduled time of arrival’ – Determination of the length of the delay.#Case C-558/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0558_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik AS v Myflyright GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Landshut.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 6 – Concept of ‘delay of a flight’ – Postponement of a flight announced in advance by the air carrier with confirmation of the new departure and arrival times – Article 5(1)(c) and Article 7(1) – Right to compensation for passengers in the event of delays of three hours or more in the arrival of the flight – Concept of ‘scheduled time of arrival’ – Determination of the length of the delay.#Case C-558/24.
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0560: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#R.S. v Minister for Justice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3(1) – Beneficiaries – Family members of a Union citizen – Derived right of residence of a third-country national – Subsequent naturalisation of that national – Article 35 – Fraud or abuse of rights – Marriage of convenience – Temporal scope – Power of investigation of the competent national authorities into the existence of a marriage of convenience.#Case C-560/24.
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0560_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#R.S. v Minister for Justice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3(1) – Beneficiaries – Family members of a Union citizen – Derived right of residence of a third-country national – Subsequent naturalisation of that national – Article 35 – Fraud or abuse of rights – Marriage of convenience – Temporal scope – Power of investigation of the competent national authorities into the existence of a marriage of convenience.#Case C-560/24.
januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0562: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition of confiscation orders – Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA – Article 8(2)(d) – Reason for non-recognition or non-execution – Rights of interested parties – Bona fide third parties – Mortgage creditor – Immovable property constituting the proceeds of the offence – Procedure for recognition and execution of a confiscation order – Judgment mortgage registered before the adoption of that order.#Case C-562/24.
januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0562_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 29 janvier 2026.##Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Reconnaissance mutuelle des décisions de confiscation – Décision-cadre 2006/783/JAI – Article 8, paragraphe 2, sous d) – Motif de non-reconnaissance et de non-exécution – Droits des parties intéressées – Tiers de bonne foi – Créancier hypothécaire – Bien immobilier constituant le produit de l’infraction – Procédure de reconnaissance et d’exécution d’une décision de confiscation – Hypothèque judiciaire enregistrée avant l’adoption de cette décision.#Affaire C-562/24. This document does not exist in English.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0563: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v PB Vi Goods GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Potsdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and protection of spirit drinks – Regulation (EU) 2019/787 – Article 10(7) – Prohibition on using legal names for any beverage that does not comply with the requirements of the relevant categories – Gin – Beverage named ‘non-alcoholic gin’ – Article 12(1) – Allusions – Validity of Article 10(7) – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-563/24.
december 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0563_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v PB Vi Goods GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Potsdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and protection of spirit drinks – Regulation (EU) 2019/787 – Article 10(7) – Prohibition on using legal names for any beverage that does not comply with the requirements of the relevant categories – Gin – Beverage named ‘non-alcoholic gin’ – Article 12(1) – Allusions – Validity of Article 10(7) – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-563/24.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0564: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Eisenberger Gerüstbau GmbH v JK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Distance contract concluded between a consumer and a trader – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Contact established between the consumer and the trader by another trader commissioned by the consumer – Article 2(7) – Right of withdrawal of the consumer – Article 9(1) – Abuse of rights.#Case C-564/24.