Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0662:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 décembre 2025.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Belgique.#Manquement d’État – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Article 45 TFUE – Article 28 de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Exécution incomplète de l’arrêt du 10 mars 2022, Commission/Belgique (Déductions des rentes alimentaires) (C-60/21) – Impôt sur le revenu – Déduction des rentes alimentaires – Irrecevabilité – Absence d’identité entre les griefs soulevés et ceux formulés dans l’affaire ayant donné lieu à l’arrêt constatant le manquement.#Affaire C-662/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0665: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport v Diamond Flavours BV and UEG Holland BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 2(40) – Concept of ‘placing on the market’ – Article 23(2) and (3) – Checks on the implementation of Directive 2014/40 – Objective of ensuring a high level of health protection – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Supply of refill containers for electronic cigarettes displaying an incorrect indication of the nicotine content on their packaging by a distributor of tobacco and related products to a retail outlet – Fine imposed on the distributor – Principle nulla poena sine culpa – Proportionality of the fine.#Case C-

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0665_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport v Diamond Flavours BV and UEG Holland BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 2(40) – Concept of ‘placing on the market’ – Article 23(2) and (3) – Checks on the implementation of Directive 2014/40 – Objective of ensuring a high level of health protection – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Supply of refill containers for electronic cigarettes displaying an incorrect indication of the nicotine content on their packaging by a distributor of tobacco and related products to a retail outlet – Fine imposed on

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0666: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal and Others v EGB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating terrorism – Article 83(1) TFEU – Directive (EU) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Terrorist offences – Article 4 – Offences relating to a terrorist group – Article 15(1) – Obligation to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties – Effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Primacy of EU law – Principle of sincere cooperation – National amnesty law which provides for the extinction of criminal liability – Acts which have not intentionally caused serious breaches of human rights.#Case C-666/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0666_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Ministerio Fiscal e.a. contre EGB e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Lutte contre le terrorisme – Article 83, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Directive (UE) 2017/541 – Article 3 – Infractions terroristes – Article 4 – Infractions liées à un groupe terroriste – Article 15, paragraphe 1 – Obligation de prévoir des sanctions pénales effectives, proportionnées et dissuasives – Effet utile – Principe de sécurité juridique – Principes d’égalité de traitement et de non-discrimination – Primauté du droit de l’Union – Principe de coopération loyale – Loi nationale d’amnistie qui prévoit l’extinction de la responsabilité pénale – Actes n’ayant pas intentionnellement causé de graves violations des droits de l’homme.#Affaire C-666/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0668:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Zehnte Kammer) vom 29. Januar 2026.#Duygu Eliz Erkut gegen Fondazione Teatro alla Scala di Milano.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Sozialpolitik – Richtlinie 1999/70/EG – EGB-UNICE‑CEEP-Rahmenvereinbarung über befristete Arbeitsverträge – Befristete Arbeitsverträge im Bereich der Stiftungen für Oper und Orchester – Auf der Grundlage aufeinanderfolgender befristeter Verträge eingestellte Arbeitnehmerin – Paragraf 5 – Maßnahmen zur Ahndung von Missbrauch durch aufeinanderfolgende befristete Arbeitsverträge oder ‑verhältnisse – Nationale Regelung, die keine Umwandlung des Arbeitsvertrags zulässt, sondern u. a. den Ersatz des erlittenen Schadens vorsieht.#Rechtssache C-668/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0679: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#HL v UniCredit Bank Zrt. and Momentum Credit Zrt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Starting point of the limitation period for an action for restitution – Resumption of the limitation period after a period of suspension.#Case C-679/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0679_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#HL v UniCredit Bank Zrt. and Momentum Credit Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Starting point of the limitation period for an action for restitution – Resumption of the limitation period after a period of suspension.#Case C-679/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0680: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the

RSS
First26252626262726282630263226332634Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top