januar 18, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0289: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 January 2023.#A.T.S. 2003 Vagyonvédelmi és Szolgáltató Zrt., en liquidation v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 167, 168 and 178 – Right to deduct input VAT – Fraud – Proof – Duty of care of the taxable person – Consideration of an infringement of the national provisions governing the supply of services at issue.#Case C-289/22.
december 02, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0295: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 24 novembre 2022.#Luis Miguel Novais contre République portugaise.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Droit institutionnel – Article 265 TFUE – Recours en carence dirigé contre une juridiction nationale – Incompétence manifeste du Tribunal de l’Union européenne – Pourvoi manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-295/22 P. This document does not exist in English.
marec 03, 2023 0 98 CELEX:62022CO0295_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 November 2022.#Luis Miguel Novais v Portuguese Republic.#Case C-295/22 P.
junij 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0300: Ordonnance du vice-président de la Cour du 12 mai 2022.#Govern d'Andorra contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Article 170 bis, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Absence de demande d’admission du pourvoi – Irrecevabilité du pourvoi.#Affaire C-300/22 P. This document does not exist in English.
september 07, 2022 0 156 CELEX:62022CO0300_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 12 May 2022.#Govern d'Andorra v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-300/22 P.
oktober 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0302: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 3. Oktober 2022.#YS und RW gegen Freebird Airlines Europe Ltd.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 99 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 – Art. 5 Abs. 3 – Ausgleichsleistungen für Fluggäste bei großer Verspätung von Flügen – Befreiung von der Ausgleichspflicht – Außergewöhnliche Umstände – Kollision eines Flugzeugs mit einem Vogel – Vollbremsung, die zur Beschädigung der Reifen dieses Flugzeugs führt.#Rechtssache C-302/22. This document does not exist in English.
februar 02, 2023 0 152 CELEX:62022CO0302_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2022.#YS and RW v Freebird Airlines Europe Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Eilenburg.#Case C-302/22.
maj 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0306: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2023.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the appellant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer working in the same law firm as the appellant.#Case C-306/22 P.
julij 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0306_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 April 2023.#Nigar Kirimova v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union – Lawyer representing the appellant as a third party – Requirement of independence – Lawyer working in the same law firm as the appellant.#Case C-306/22 P.
januar 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0315: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents allegedly held by the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Action directed against the implied rejection of the request for access to documents – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-315/22 P.