julij 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0335: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 19 juillet 2023.#A SA contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 2008/7/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Impôts indirects frappant les rassemblements de capitaux – Droit de timbre frappant les services de placement d’obligations et de billets de trésorerie sur le marché.#Affaire C-335/22. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 10, 2023 0 20 CELEX:62022CO0335_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 July 2023.#A, SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Case C-335/22.
maj 16, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0337(01): Order of the President of the Court of 27 April 2023.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Rejection of the opposition – Refusal to take into account earlier rights protected in the United Kingdom – Relevant stage of the procedure for assessing the existence of a relative ground for refusal – Association of proprietors of trade marks and professionals in that field with the purpose of promoting trade mark law – Allowed.#Case C-337/22 P.
november 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0337: Order of the Court of 16 November 2022.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-337/22 P.
april 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0337_SUM: Order of the Court (Chambre determining whether appeals should proceed) of 16 November 2022.#European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Nowhere Co. Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-337/22 P.
september 29, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0338: Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 22 septembre 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-338/22 P. This document does not exist in English.
januar 16, 2023 0 94 CELEX:62022CO0338_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 September 2022.#Anna Hrebenyuk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-338/22 P.
oktober 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0342: Order of the Court of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.
januar 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0342_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.
januar 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0357: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2022.#Ahmad Aziz v European Data Protection Supervisor.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Law governing the institutions – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Refusal of access to personal data allegedly held by the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) – Complaints to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) following the refusal of access – Action directed against the implied rejection of the complaints – Admissibility – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Sufficiently clear and precise statement of the pleas in law relied on – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded