oktober 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0276: Case T-276/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position of the colours white, red and dark green on cuboid packaging) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU trade mark consisting in the application of the colours white, red and dark green to cuboid packaging — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
oktober 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0277: Case T-277/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position of the colours red and white on cuboid packaging) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU trade mark consisting in the application of the colours red and white to cuboid packaging — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
december 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0281: Case T-281/22: Judgment of the General Court of 23 October 2024 – Xpand Consortium and Others v Commission (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Development, implementation, maintenance/operations, advice and consultancy services in accounting/finance and financial IT systems – Cancellation of the procurement procedure – Article 171 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Obligation to state reasons)
januar 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0282: Case T-282/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2023 — Mazepin v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Proportionality)
februar 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0283: Case T-283/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 December 2023 — Moshkovich v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on movement — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintaining of the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Criterion of a leading businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of Russia — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business — Right to respect for
julij 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0288: Case T-288/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2024 – VEB.RF v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Exclusion of SWIFT services – Obligation to state reasons – Article 2(1)(b) and (d) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 1e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Error of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers)
april 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0289: Case T-289/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Shuvalov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Status of natural person supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Freedom of expression — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Right to property — Right
oktober 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0290: Cases T-290/22 and T-763/22: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Kesaev v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of businessperson involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Right to property – Pr
oktober 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0291: Case T-291/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2023 — Pumpyanskiy v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of the applicant's name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Concept of ‘association’ — Proportionality — Legal certainty)
november 20, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0293: Case T-293/22: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2023 — PB v SRB (Civil service — Temporary staff — Reclassification — 2021 reclassification exercise — Decision not to reclassify — Article 54 of the CEOS — General provisions for the implementation of Article 54 of the CEOS — Obligation to consider comparative merits — Obligation to state reasons — Criterion relating to the level of responsibilties exercised — Seniority in the grade — Reclassification quotas — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment)