oktober 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0633_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#Real Madrid Club de Fútbol et AE contre EE et Société Éditrice du Monde SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Articles 34 et 45 – Reconnaissance et exécution des décisions – Révocation d’une déclaration constatant la force exécutoire de décisions – Motifs de refus – Ordre public de l’État membre requis – Condamnation d’un journal et de l’un de ses journalistes pour atteinte à la réputation d’un club sportif – Dommages-intérêts – Article 11 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Liberté de la press This document does not exist in English.
april 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0634: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against OT and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Values and objectives of the European Union – Article 2 TEU – Rule of law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independent and impartial court – Reorganisation of jurisdiction of courts in a Member State – Abolition of a specialised criminal court – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-634/22.
december 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0634_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against OT and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Values and objectives of the European Union – Article 2 TEU – Rule of law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Independent and impartial court – Reorganisation of jurisdiction of courts in a Member State – Abolition of a specialised criminal court – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-634/22.
februar 16, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0638: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 16 février 2023.#T.C. e.a. contre M.C. et Prokurator Prokuratury Okręgowej we Wrocławiu.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière matrimoniale et en matière de responsabilité parentale – Enlèvement international d’enfants – Convention de La Haye de 1980 – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Article 11 – Demande de retour d’un enfant – Décision définitive ordonnant le retour d’un enfant – Législation d’un État membre prévoyant le sursis à l’exécution de cette décision intervenant de plein droit en cas de demande introduite par certaines autorités nationales.#A This document does not exist in English.
september 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0639: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#X and Others v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Utrecht and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(g) – Management of special investment funds – Definition – Pension funds – Comparability with an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – Investment risk borne by the members – Scope – Need for comparison with a pension fund regarded by the Member State concerned as a special investment fund.#Joined Cases C-639/22 to C-643/22.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0639_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#X and Others v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Utrecht and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Gelderland.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(g) – Management of special investment funds – Definition – Pension funds – Comparability with an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) – Investment risk borne by the members – Scope – Need for comparison with a pension fund regarded by the Member State concerned as a special investment fund.#Joined Cases C-639/22 to C-644/22.
oktober 12, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0645: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2023.#R. A. and Others v „Luminor Bank AS“,agissant par intermédiaire de „Luminor Bank AS“ Lietuvos skyrius.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Intention of a consumer to preserve a contract by amending the terms found to be unfair – Powers of the national court.#Case C-645/22.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0645_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2023.#R. A. and Others v „Luminor Bank AS“,agissant par intermédiaire de „Luminor Bank AS“ Lietuvos skyrius.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Intention of a consumer to preserve a contract by amending the terms found to be unfair – Powers of the national court.#Case C-645/22.
november 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0646: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 November 2024.#Compass Banca SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 2(j), Articles 5, 8 and 9 – Concept of ‘average consumer’ – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Concept of ‘aggressive commercial practice’ – Cross-selling of a personal loan and an insurance product not related to that loan – Orientation of the information provided to the consumer – Concept of ‘framing’ – Commercial practice consisting of simultaneously proposing to a consumer an offer for a personal loan and an offer for an insurance product not related to that loan – No cooling-off period between the signature of the loan contract
februar 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0649: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#XXX v Randstad Empleo ETT, SAU and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 5(1) – Principle of equal treatment – Article 3(1)(f) – Concept of ‘basic working and employment conditions applicable to temporary agency workers’ – Concept of ‘pay’ – Compensation payable in respect of the total permanent incapacity of a temporary agency worker to carry out his or her usual occupation as a result of an accident at work which occurred during his or her assignment.#Case C-649/22.