marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0249_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2023.#BM v Gebühren Info Service GmbH (GIS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Concept – Activities of a public radio and television body financed by a compulsory fee paid by persons in possession of a radio and television receiver in the terrestrial broadcasting area – Article 378(1) and point 2 of Part A of Annex X – Act of accession of the Republic of Austria – Derogation – Scope.#Case C-249/22.
februar 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0251: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2024.#Scania AB and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Truck market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies required by Euro 3 to Euro 6 standards and the passing on of the costs of those technologies to customers – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of that infringement – ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure – Article 41 of the Ch
januar 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0252: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0252_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0255: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Orlen S.A., anciennement Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen S.A., anciennement Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Gas markets of Central and Eastern Europe – Article 102 TFEU – Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Abuse of dominant position – Upstream gas supplies in Central and Eastern Europe – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 9(1) – Decision of the European Commission to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Action for annulment – Adequacy of those commitments in the light of the competition concerns identified in the statement of objections – Nature of the EU Courts’ power of review – Commission decisio
februar 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0256: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-256/22 P.
december 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0256_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-256/22 P.
november 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0257: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘illegal stay’ – Directive 2013/32/EU – Applicant for international protection – Article 9(1) – Right to remain in the Member State pending the examination of the application – Return decision adopted before the adoption of the first-instance decision rejecting the application for international protection.#Case C-257/22.
marec 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0257_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘illegal stay’ – Directive 2013/32/EU – Applicant for international protection – Article 9(1) – Right to remain in the Member State pending the examination of the application – Return decision adopted before the adoption of the first-instance decision rejecting the application for international protection.#Case C-257/22.
junij 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0258: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – Business tax – Calculation of the basis of assessment for that tax – Rules for calculation – Dividends from holdings of less than 10% in the capital of resident and non-resident capital companies – Inclusion in the basis of assessment for business tax – Time of the inclusion – Difference in treatment – Restriction – None.#Case C-258/22.