maj 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0663_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Expedia Inc. v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Articles 1, 15, 16 and 18 – Objective – Application – Monitoring – Review – Measures adopted by a Member State – Obligation to provide information on the economic situation of a provider of online intermediation services.#Case C-663/22.
maj 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0664: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Google Ireland Limited and Eg Vacation Rentals Ireland Limited v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to be entered in the register of communications operators – Obligation to provide information on structure and organisation – Obligation to make a financial contribution – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Joined Cases C-664/22 and C-666/22.
februar 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0664_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Google Ireland Ltd and Eg Vacation Rentals Ireland Ltd v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to be entered in the register of communications operators – Obligation to provide information on structure and organisation – Obligation to make a financial contribution – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Joined Cases C-6
maj 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0665: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Amazon Services Europe Sàrl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to provide information on the economic situation of a provider of online intermediation services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Case C-665/22.
februar 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0665_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Amazon Services Europe Sàrl v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Providers of information society services – Obligation to provide information on the economic situation of a provider of online intermediation services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Principle of control in the home Member State – Exemptions – Concept of measures ‘taken against a given information society service’ – Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 – Objective.#Case C-665/22.
maj 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0670: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v M.N.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters – Obtaining of evidence already in the possession of the competent authorities of the executing State – Conditions for issuing an EIO – Encrypted telecommunications service – EncroChat – Need for the decision of a judge – Use of evidence obtained in breach of EU law.#Case C-670/22.
maj 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0670_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against M.N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order (EIO) in criminal matters – Obtaining of evidence already in the possession of the competent authorities of the executing State – Conditions for issuing an EIO – Encrypted telecommunications service – EncroChat – Need for the decision of a judge – Use of evidence obtained in breach of EU law.#Case C-670/22.
marec 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0671: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#T GmbH v Bezirkshautpmannschaft Spittal an der Drau.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Prevention of deterioration of the status of all bodies of surface water – Point 1.2.2 of Annex V – Definitions for ‘high’, ‘good’ and ‘moderate’ ecological status in lakes – Criteria for assessing the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’.#Case C-671/22.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0671_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#T GmbH v Bezirkshautpmannschaft Spittal an der Drau.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Prevention of deterioration of the status of all bodies of surface water – Point 1.2.2 of Annex V – Definitions for ‘high’, ‘good’ and ‘moderate’ ecological status in lakes – Criteria for assessing the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’.#Case C-671/22.
maj 17, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0673: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#CCC v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) and Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Balance between working life and private life of parents – Single-parent family – Equal treatment with two-parent families – Extension of maternity leave – Article 5 – Parental leave – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-673/22.