Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0237_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Orphan medicinal products – Articles 3 and 8 – Concept of ‘significant benefit’ – Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ – Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Article 3 – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Tobramycin VVB – Period of market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin – Derogation from that market exclusivity.#Case C-237/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0238:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 26. Oktober 2023.#FW gegen LATAM Airlines Group SA.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 – Art. 2 Buchst. j – Art. 3 – Art. 4 Abs. 3 – Ausgleichsleistungen für Fluggäste im Fall der Nichtbeförderung – Fluggast, der im Voraus über die Nichtbeförderung unterrichtet wurde – Keine Verpflichtung des Fluggasts, sich am Flugsteig einzufinden – Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c – Ausnahmen vom Ausgleichsanspruch bei Annullierung eines Fluges – Unanwendbarkeit dieser Ausnahmen bei vorweggenommener Beförderungsverweigerung.#Rechtssache C-238/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0238_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2023.#FW v LATAM Airlines Group SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(j) – Article 3 – Article 4(3) – Compensation of air passengers in the event of denied boarding – Passenger informed in advance that boarding would be denied – No obligation for the passenger to present him or herself for boarding – Article 5(1)(c) – Exceptions to the right to compensation in the event of a flight cancellation – Inapplicability of those exceptions in the event of a pre-emptive denial of boarding.#Case C-238/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0239: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 12(1) and (2) – Supply, before first occupation, of a building or parts of a building and of the land on which the building stands – No provisions in national law providing for detailed rules for applying the criterion relating to first occupation – Article 135(1)(j) – Exemptions – Supply, after conversion, of a building which was the subject of a first occupation before the conversion – National administrative legal commentary treating buildings which have undergone substantial conversions in the same way as new buildings.#Case C-239/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0240: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 October 2024.#European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Loyalty rebates – Characterisation as abuse – Strategy aiming to exclude competitors that are at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking from the market.#Case C-240/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0240_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 October 2024.#European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Loyalty rebates – Characterisation as abuse – Strategy aiming to exclude competitors that are at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking from the market.#Case C-240/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0242:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 1er août 2022.#TL contre Ministério Público.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2010/64/UE – Droit à l’interprétation et à la traduction – Article 2, paragraphe 1, et article 3, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “document essentiel” – Directive 2012/13/UE – Droit à l’information dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous d) – Champ d’application – Absence de transposition en droit national – Effet direct – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 47 et article 48, paragraphe 2 – Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales – Article 6 – Condamnation à une peine de pri

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0242_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Criminal proceedings against TL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Right to interpretation and translation – Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) – Concept of an ‘essential document’ – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 3(1)(d) – Scope – Not implemented in domestic law – Direct effect – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 and Article 48(2) – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Suspended prison sentence with probatio

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0246: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#Staatsanwaltschaft Köln and Bundesamt für Güterverkehr v BW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport operations – Combined transport of goods between Member States – Directive 92/106/EEC – International carriage of goods by road – Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 – Transport of empty containers before loading or after unloading of goods in the context of combined transport – Non-applicability of the provisions relating to cabotage operations.#Case C-246/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0249:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 26. Oktober 2023.#BM gegen Gebühren Info Service GmbH (GIS).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsames Mehrwertsteuersystem – Richtlinie 2006/112/EG – Art. 2 Abs. 1 Buchst. c – Dienstleistung, die gegen Entgelt erbracht wird – Begriff – Tätigkeiten einer öffentlichen Rundfunk- und Fernsehanstalt, die durch eine gesetzliche Gebühr finanziert werden, die von Personen gezahlt wird, die ein Radio-oder Fernsehgerät besitzen, das sich an einem terrestrisch versorgten Standort befindet – Art. 378 Abs. 1 und Anhang X Teil A Nr. 2 – Beitrittsakte der Republik Österreich – Ausnahme – Anwendungsbereich.#Rechtssache C-249/22.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First15411542154315441546154815491550Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top