Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0584_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination – Foreseeability of the occurrence of those consequences at the date of the declaration of termination – Events occurring after the termination date but before the start of the package.#Case C-584/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0585:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#X BV contre Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Liberté d’établissement – Article 49 TFUE – Impôt sur les sociétés – Emprunt transfrontalier intragroupe aux fins du financement de l’acquisition ou de l’augmentation d’une participation dans une société non liée au groupe concerné qui devient, à la suite de cette opération, liée à ce groupe – Déduction des intérêts versés au titre de cet emprunt – Emprunt contracté à des conditions de pleine concurrence – Notion de “montage purement artificiel” – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-585/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0585_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 octobre 2024.#X BV contre Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Liberté d’établissement – Article 49 TFUE – Impôt sur les sociétés – Emprunt transfrontalier intragroupe aux fins du financement de l’acquisition ou de l’augmentation d’une participation dans une société non liée au groupe concerné qui devient, à la suite de cette opération, liée à ce groupe – Déduction des intérêts versés au titre de cet emprunt – Emprunt contracté à des conditions de pleine concurrence – Notion de “montage purement artificiel” – Principe de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-585/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0588: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(b) TFEU – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted to an airline by the Republic of Finland in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Recapitalisation of Finnair plc – Decision by the European Commission not to raise any objections – Aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy – Principles of proportionality and of non-discrimination.#Case C-588/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#J.L.O.G. and J.J.O.P. v Resorts Mallorca Hotels International SL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 2(1) – Point at which the obligation to provide information and hold consultations arises – Number of actual or projected redundancies – Article 1(1) – Voluntary terminations of employment contracts before redundancies – Method for calculating the number of redundancies.#Case C-589/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0589_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#J.L.O.G. and J.J.O.P. v Resorts Mallorca Hotels International SL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de las Islas Baleares.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 2(1) – Point at which the obligation to provide information and hold consultations arises – Number of actual or projected redundancies – Article 1(1) – Voluntary terminations of employment contracts before redundancies – Method for calculating the number of redundancies.#Case C-589/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0590: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#AT and BT v PS GbR and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing which infringes that regulation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Impact of the seriousness of the damage suffered – Assessment of the amount of compensation – Claim for compensation for non-material damage based on fear – Inapplicability of the criteria laid down for administrative fines in Article 83 – Dissuasive function – Assessment where that regulation and national law are infringed simultaneously.#Case C-590/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0590_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#AT and BT v PS GbR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wesel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation for damage caused by data processing which infringes that regulation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Impact of the seriousness of the damage suffered – Assessment of the amount of compensation – Claim for compensation for non-material damage based on fear – Inapplicability of the criteria laid down for administrative fines in Article 83 – Dissuasive function – Assessment where that regulation and national law are infringed simultaneously.#C

RSS
First15371538153915401542154415451546Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top