julij 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0173_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 November 2023.#MG v European Investment Bank.#Appeal – Civil service – Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – EIB Staff Rules – Remuneration – Family allowances – Payment to the sole parent with full custody of the child – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41(2) – Right to be heard – Plea of illegality in respect of the Staff Rules – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-173/22 P.
november 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0175: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#Criminal proceedings against BK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 6 – Right to information about the accusation – Article 6(4) – Changes in the information given – Amendment of the classification of the criminal offence – Obligation to inform the accused person in due time and to offer him or her the opportunity to put forward his or her arguments regarding the new envisaged classification – Effective exercise of the rights of the defence – Fairness of the proceedings – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present
marec 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0175_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#Criminal proceedings against BK.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 6 – Right to information about the accusation – Article 6(4) – Changes in the information given – Amendment of the classification of the criminal offence – Obligation to inform the accused person in due time and to offer him or her the opportunity to put forward his or her arguments regarding the new envisaged classification – Effective exercise of the rights of the defence – Fairness of the proceedings – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be pres
maj 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0176: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#Spetsializirana prokuratura v BK and ZhP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Article 23, first paragraph – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU – Possibility of a partial stay of proceedings.#Case C-176/22.
september 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0176_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#Criminal proceedings against BK and ZhP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Article 23, first paragraph – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU – Possibility of a partial stay of proceedings.#Case C-176/22.
marec 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0177: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#JA v Wurth Automotive GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction over consumer contracts – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Conduct of the person claiming the status of consumer that may give rise to the impression, on the part of the other contracting party, that he or she is acting for professional purposes.#Case C-177/22.
marec 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0177_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#JA v Wurth Automotive GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction over consumer contracts – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Conduct of the person claiming the status of consumer that may give rise to the impression, on the part of the other contracting party, that he or she is acting for professional purposes.#Case C-177/22.
maj 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0178: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#Inconnus v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Articles 7, 8, 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to those data requested by a national authority having competence to prosecute offences of aggravated theft – Definition of the concept of ‘serious offence’ the prosecution of which is capable of justifying serious interference with fundamental rights – Competence of the Member States – Principle of proportionality – Sc
maj 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0178_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bolzano / Landesgericht Bozen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Articles 7, 8, 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to those data requested by a national authority having competence to prosecute offences of aggravated theft – Definition of the concept of ‘serious offence’ the prosecution of which is capable of justifying seriou
julij 13, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0180: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2023.#Finanzamt Hamm v Harry Mensing.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 311 et seq. – Special arrangements for works of art – Margin scheme – Taxable dealers – Supply of works of art by creators or their successors in title – Intra-Community transactions – Right to deduct input tax.#Case C-180/22.