marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0207_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 October 2023.#Lineas - Concessões de Transportes SGPS, S.A. and Others v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#References for a preliminary ruling – Economic and monetary policy – Supervision of the European Union’s financial sector – Directive 2013/36/EU – Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 – Financial institution – Concept – Undertaking whose activity is the acquisition of holdings.#Joined Cases C-207/22, C-267/22 and C-290/22.
september 07, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0209: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Directive 2013/48/EU – Scope – National legislation which does not refer to the concept of a suspect – Preliminary stage of the criminal proceedings – Coercive measure of personal search and seizure – Retrospective authorisation by the court having jurisdiction – Lack of judicial review of measures to obtain evidence – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective exercise of the rights of defence of suspects and of accused persons during the judicial review of measur
marec 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0209_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2023.#Criminal proceedings against.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Directive 2013/48/EU – Scope – National legislation which does not refer to the concept of a suspect – Preliminary stage of the criminal proceedings – Coercive measure of personal search and seizure – Retrospective authorisation by the court having jurisdiction – Lack of judicial review of measures to obtain evidence – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective exercise of the rights of defence of suspects and of accused persons dur
september 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0210: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Stappert Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 60(2) – Acquisition of origin of goods – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Article 32 – Goods the production of which involves more than one country or territory – Annex 22-01 – Primary rule applicable to goods under subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised System – Concept of ‘hollow profile’ – Steel ‘tube blanks’ under subheading 7304 49 of the Harmonised System, obtained by hot-forming and enabling the production of steel tubes by cold forming, under subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised System – Validity of the primary rule.#Case C-210/22.
junij 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0211: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#Super Bock Bebidas SA and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Vertical agreements – Minimum resale prices fixed by a supplier to its distributors – Concept of ‘restriction of competition by object’ – Concept of ‘agreement’ – Proof of a concurrence of wills between the supplier and its distributors – Practice covering almost the entire territory of a Member State – Effect on trade between Member States – Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 and Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Hardcore restriction.#Case C-211/22.
marec 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0211_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#Super Bock Bebidas SA and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Vertical agreements – Minimum resale prices fixed by a supplier to its distributors – Concept of ‘restriction of competition by object’ – Concept of ‘agreement’ – Proof of a concurrence of wills between the supplier and its distributors – Practice covering almost the entire territory of a Member State – Effect on trade between Member States – Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 and Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Hardcore restriction.#Case C-211/22.
november 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0213: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP v CS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) – Community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 – Article 3, first paragraph, points (b) and (c) – Aid scheme – Maintenance premiums and premiums for loss of income – Conditions for granting – National legislation laying down a requirement of a minimum reforestation density of the plots – Failure to comply with the requirement for a reason not attributable to the beneficiary – Obligation to repay the aid – Force majeure – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-213/22.
marec 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0213_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas, IP v CS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) – Community aid scheme for forestry measures in agriculture – Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 – Article 3, first paragraph, points (b) and (c) – Aid scheme – Maintenance premiums and premiums for loss of income – Conditions for granting – National legislation laying down a requirement of a minimum reforestation density of the plots – Failure to comply with the requirement for a reason not attributable to the beneficiary – Obligation to repay the aid – Force majeure – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-213
februar 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0216: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#A. A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(d) and Article 40(2) and (3) – Subsequent application – Conditions for rejecting such an application as inadmissible – Concept of ‘new elements or findings’ – Judgment of the Court on a question of interpretation of EU law – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Jurisdiction of the national court or tribunal to rule on such an application on the merits in the event of illegality of the decision rejecting an application as inadmissible – Procedural safeguards – Article 14(2).#Case C-216/22.
maj 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0216_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#A. A. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Sigmaringen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(d) and Article 40(2) and (3) – Subsequent application – Conditions for rejecting such an application as inadmissible – Concept of ‘new elements or findings’ – Judgment of the Court on a question of interpretation of EU law – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Jurisdiction of the national court or tribunal to rule on such an application on the merits in the event of illegality of the decision rejecting an application as inadmissible – Procedural saf