Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0688_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 – Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Definitive collection of the provisional duties – Hierarchy between the calculation methods – Calculation of the undercutting margin.#Case C-688/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0695: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Fondee a.s. v Česká národní banka.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2014/65/EU – Article 3 – Exemption from the application of Directive 2014/65/EU – Exempted investment intermediary – Legislation of a Member State prohibiting that intermediary from transmitting clients’ orders to an investment firm established in another Member State.#Case C-695/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0695_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Fondee a.s. v Česká národní banka.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2014/65/EU – Article 3 – Exemption from the application of Directive 2014/65/EU – Exempted investment intermediary – Legislation of a Member State prohibiting that intermediary from transmitting clients’ orders to an investment firm established in another Member State.#Case C-695/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0696: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#C SPRL v AJFP Cluj and DGRFP Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 64(1) and (2) – Applicability – Services of court-appointed administrators and liquidators – Continuous supply of services – Article 168(a) – Deduction of input VAT – Expenditure relating to the right to use a trade name – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard.#Case C-696/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0696_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#C SPRL v contreAdministrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice (AJFP) Cluj and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 64(1) and (2) – Applicability – Services of court-appointed administrators and liquidators – Continuous supply of services – Article 168(a) – Deduction of input VAT – Expenditure relating to the right to use a trade name – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard.#Case C-696/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0697: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, anciennement Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) – Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure – Identification of the beneficiary of the aid – Obligation to publish an amending opening decision – Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments – Essential procedural requirement – Incompatibility with the internal market – Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission – Amount to be recovered – Competence of the Member State concerned.#Case C-697/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0697_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, anciennement Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) – Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure – Identification of the beneficiary of the aid – Obligation to publish an amending opening decision – Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments – Essential procedural requirement – Incompatibility with the internal market – Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission – Amount to be recovered – Competence of the Member State concerned.#Case C-697/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0700: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 December 2023.#RegioJet a. s. and STUDENT AGENCY k.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Existing aid and new aid – Aid granted in disregard of the procedural rules laid down in Article 108(3) TFEU – Expiry of the limitation period provided for in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Obligation on the national court to order the recovery of the aid.#Case C-700/22.

RSS
First15481549155015511553155515561557Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top