Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0531: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3 – General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 14 – Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ – Consultation of a patent lawyer – Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party.#Case C-531/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0531_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#NovaText GmbH v Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property rights – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 3 – General obligation concerning the measures, procedures and remedies necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights – Article 14 – Concept of ‘reasonable and proportionate legal costs’ – Consultation of a patent lawyer – Absence of opportunity for the national court to assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the costs to be borne by the unsuccessful party.#Case C-531/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0532:           Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 24 février 2022.#Alstom Transport SA contre Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 92/13/CEE – Procédures de passation des marchés des entités opérant dans les secteurs de l’eau, de l’énergie, des transports et des télécommunications – Article 1er, paragraphes 1 et 3 – Accès aux procédures de recours – Article 2 quater – Délais d’introduction d’un recours – Calcul – Recours contre une décision d’admission d’un soumissionnaire.#Affaire C-532/20.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0532_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 92/13/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Article 1(1) and (3) – Access to review procedures – Article 2c – Time limits for applying for review – Calculation – Review of a decision allowing a tenderer to participate.#Case C-532/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0533: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0533_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 March 2022.#Somogy Megyei Kormányhivatal v Upfield Hungary Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Labelling – Mandatory particulars – List of ingredients – Specific name of those ingredients – Addition of a vitamin to a food – Obligation to indicate the specific name of that vitamin – No obligation to indicate the vitamin formulation used.#Case C-533/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0534: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.

0 0

CELEX:62020CJ0534_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.

RSS
First892893894895897899900901Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top