januar 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0560: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#CR and Others v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 10(3)(a) – Family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee with his or her first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ – Minor sponsor at the time of submission of the application but who attained majority during the family reunification procedure – Relevant date for assessing minor status – Period for submitting an application for family reunification – Adult sister of the sponsor requiring the permanent assistance of her parents on account of a seri
junij 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0560_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#CR and Others v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Right to family reunification – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 10(3)(a) – Family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee with his or her first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line – Article 2(f) – Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ – Minor sponsor at the time of submission of the application but who attained majority during the family reunification procedure – Relevant date for assessing minor status – Period for submitting an application for family reunification – Adult sister of the sponsor
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0561: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Q and Others v United Airlines, Inc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Connecting flight consisting of two legs – Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country – Validity of that regulation under international law.#Case C-561/20.
april 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0561_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Q and Others v United Airlines, Inc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Connecting flight consisting of two flight legs – Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country – Validity of that regulation under international law.#Case C-561/20.
november 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0562: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Erste Kammer) vom 17. November 2022.#SIA „Rodl & Partner” gegen Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Verhinderung der Nutzung des Finanzsystems zum Zwecke der Geldwäsche und der Terrorismusfinanzierung – Richtlinie (EU) 2015/849 – Art. 18 Abs. 1 und 3 – Anhang III Nr. 3 Buchst. b – Risikobasierter Ansatz – Bewertung der Risiken durch die Verpflichteten – Risikoermittlung durch die Mitgliedstaaten und die Verpflichteten – Sorgfaltspflichten gegenüber Kunden – Verstärkte Sorgfaltspflichten – Drittland mit hohem Korruptionsrisiko – Art. 13 Abs. 1 Buchst. c und d – Nachweis- und Dokumentationsanforderungen an die Verpflichteten – Art. 14 Abs. 5 – Den Verpflichteten obliegende kontinuierliche Überwachung in Bezug auf Ku This document does not exist in English.
februar 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0563: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 24 février 2022.#ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. contre Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports ferroviaires – Directive 2001/14/CE – Article 4 – Fixation des redevances d’infrastructure par décision du gestionnaire – Article 30, paragraphe 2 – Droit de recours administratif des entreprises ferroviaires – Article 30, paragraphe 6 – Contrôle juridictionnel des décisions de l’organisme de contrôle.#Affaire C-563/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0563_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 4 – Setting of infrastructure charges by decision of the manager – Article 30(2) – Railway undertakings’ right to bring an administrative action – Article 30(6) – Judicial review of the decisions of the regulatory body.#Case C-563/20.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0564: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#PF and MF v Minister for Agriculture Food and the Marine and Sea Fisheries Protection Authority.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system – Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 – Recording of catches and fishing effort – Transmission to the European Commission of information concerning the quantities of nephrops caught – Possibility to use data other than those contained in the fishing logbook – Reasonable and scientifically valid method to process and verify data – Closure of fisheries.#Case C-564/20.
maj 05, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0567: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#A.H. contre Zagrebačka banka d.d.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Clauses abusives – Directive 93/13/CEE – Applicabilité ratione temporis – Article 10, paragraphe 1 – Contrat de prêt conclu avant la date d’adhésion d’un État membre à l’Union européenne mais modifié après cette date – Article 6 – Restitution des avantages indument perçus par le professionnel – Législation nationale prévoyant le remplacement de clauses abusives et la restitution du trop‑perçu au titre de celles‑ci – Applicabilité ratione materiae – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Exclusion des clauses reflétant des dispositions législatives ou réglementaires impératives.#Affaire C-567/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0567_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#A.H. v Zagrebačka banka d.d.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms – Directive 93/13/EEC – Applicability ratione temporis – Article 10(1) – Loan agreement concluded prior to Member State’s accession to the EU but amended after that date – Article 6 – Reimbursement of benefits improperly obtained by the seller or supplier – National legislation providing for the replacement of unfair terms and reimbursement of the overpayment – Applicability ratione materiae – Article 1(2) – Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions.#Case C-567/20.