avgust 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0483_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for family life – Artic
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0485: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#XXXX v HR Rail SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Dismissal of a worker who had become permanently incapable of performing the essential functions of the post – Staff member completing training as part of recruitment – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities – Requirement to reassign to another post – Obligation subject to it not being a disproportionate burden for the employer.#Case C-485/20.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0487: Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 10 février 2022.#Philips Orăştie S.R.L. contre Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Harmonisation des législations fiscales – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 179 et 183 – Droit à déduction de la TVA – Modalités – Compensation ou remboursement de l’excédent de TVA – Obligations de paiement supplémentaires – Principe de neutralité fiscale – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité.#Affaire C-487/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0489: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#UB v Kauno teritorinė muitinė.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Extinguishment of the customs debt – Goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the European Union – Seizure and confiscation – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties – Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax – Chargeable event – Chargeability.#Case C-489/20.
april 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0489_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#UB v Kauno teritorinė muitinė.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Union Customs Code – Extinguishment of the customs debt – Goods unlawfully introduced into the customs territory of the European Union – Seizure and confiscation – Directive 2008/118/EC – Excise duties – Directive 2006/112/EC – Value added tax – Chargeable event – Chargeability.#Case C-489/20.
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0490_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2021.#V.М.А. v Stolichna obshtina, rayon „Pancharevo“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Child born in the host Member State of her parents – Birth certificate issued by that Member State mentioning two mothers in respect of that child – Refusal by the Member State of origin of one of those two mothers to issue a birth certificate for the child in the absence of information as to the identity of the child’s biological mother – Possession of such a certificate being a prerequisite for the issue of an identity card
avgust 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0497_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Randstad Italia SpA v Umana SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Public procurement – Directive 89/665/EEC – Article 1(1) and (3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Judgment of a Member State’s highest administrative court declaring inadmissible, in breach of the case-law of the Court of Justice, an action brought by a tenderer excluded from a public procurement procedure – No remedy against that judgment before
marec 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0498: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 10. März 2022.#ZK en qualité de successeur de JM, curateur à la faillite de BMA Nederland BV gegen BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Zivilsachen – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1215/2012 – Art. 7 Nr. 2 – Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit für Klagen, bei denen eine unerlaubte Handlung oder eine Handlung, die einer unerlaubten Handlung gleichgestellt ist, oder Ansprüche aus einer solchen Handlung den Gegenstand des Verfahrens bilden – Klage eines Insolvenzverwalters gegen einen Dritten im Interesse der Gläubiger – Ort des Eintritts des schädigenden Ereignisses – Art. 8 Nr. 2 – Interventionsklage eines Vertreters kollektiver Interessen – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 864/200 This document does not exist in English.
april 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0498_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2022.#ZK v BMA Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(2) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Claim made by a liquidator against a third party in the interests of creditors – Place where the harmful event occurred – Article 8(2) – Application to intervene by a defendant of collective interests – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Scope – General rule.#Case C-498/20.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0499: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#DIMCO Dimovasili M.I.K.E. v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 97/23/EC – Pressure equipment – CE marking – Placing on the market and putting into service – Restrictions aimed at ensuring the protection of persons – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – National legislation imposing restrictions on the method of installation of gas pipes.#Case C-499/20.