maj 19, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0466: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods.#Case C-466/20.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0466_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022.#HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH and RW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9 – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Articles 54, 110 and 111 – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Concept of ‘acquiescence’ – Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Sending of a warning letter – Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated – Effects of limitation – Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods.#Case C-466/20.
junij 08, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0468: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Fastweb SpA and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC et 2002/22/EC – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFUE – Freedom to provide services – National legislation granting the national regulatory authority the power to impose on telephony service providers a minimum time frame for the renewal of offers and a minimum time frame for billing – Consumer protection – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-468/20.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0468_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023.#Fastweb SpA and Others v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC et 2002/22/EC – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – National legislation granting the national regulatory authority the power to impose on telephony service providers a minimum time frame for the renewal of offers and a minimum time frame for billing – Consumer protection – Principle of proportionality – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-468/20.
december 15, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0470: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2022.#AS Veejaam and OÜ Espo v AS Elering.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Renewable energy subsidy – Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 – Incentive effect of aid applied for after work has started on the project concerned – Article 108(3) TFEU – Obligation to notify – Consequences of breach of the obligation to notify.#Case C-470/20.
marec 31, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0472: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 31 mars 2022.#Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. contre PN.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives – Contrats de crédit – Prêt libellé en devise remboursable en monnaie nationale – Clause contractuelle mettant le risque de change à charge du consommateur – Caractère abusif d’une clause se rapportant à l’objet principal du contrat – Effets – Nullité du contrat – Préjudice grave pour le consommateur – Effet utile de la directive 93/13 – Avis non contraignant de la juridiction suprême – Possibilité de rétablir les parties dans la situation qui aurait été la leur si ce contrat n’avait pas été conclu.#Affaire C-472/20. This document does not exist in English.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0472_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms – Credit agreements – Loan denominated in a foreign currency repayable in national currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the agreement – Effects – Invalidity of the agreement – Serious harm to the consumer – Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 – Non-binding opinion of the highest court – Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that agreement had not been concluded.#Case C-472/20.
oktober 20, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0473: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 octobre 2022.#INVEST FUND MANAGEMENT contre Komisia za finansov nadzor.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Directive 2009/65/CE – Organismes de placement collectif en valeurs mobilières (OPCVM) – Sociétés de gestion d’OPCVM – Obligations concernant l’information des investisseurs – Article 72 – Obligation de mise à jour des “éléments essentiels du prospectus” – Portée – Article 69, paragraphe 2 – Renseignements mentionnés dans le schéma A de l’annexe I – Composition d’un organe de la société de gestion – Article 99 bis, sous r) – Transposition dans l’ordre juridique des États membres – Réglementation nationale étendant les situations dans lesquelles une infraction relative à la mise à jour du prospec This document does not exist in English.
september 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0475: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2022.#Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Restrictions – Betting and gambling – Licences for the management of games played on gaming machines – National legislation imposing a levy on licence holders – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Joined Cases C-475/20 to C-481/20.
februar 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62020CJ0483: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022.#XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for family life – Article 24 – Best interests of the child – No infringement of Artic