Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0461: Case C-461/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Advania Sverige AB, Kammarkollegiet v Dustin Sverige AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 72 — Modification of contracts during their term — Transfer of a framework agreement — New contractor assuming on the insolvency of the initial contractor the rights and obligations attributed to the latter under a framework agreement — Whether need for a new procurement procedure)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0463: Case C-463/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — Namur-Est Environnement ASBL v Région wallonne (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2011/92/EU — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Relationship between the assessment and consent procedure referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2011/92/EU and a national procedure of derogation from the species protection measures provided for in Directive 92/43/EEC — Concept of ‘consent’ — Complex decision-making process — Obligation to conduct an assessment — Material scope — Procedural stage at which public participation in the deci

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0465: Case C-465/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 10 September 2024 – European Commission v Ireland, Apple Sales International, Apple Operations International, formerly Apple Operations Europe, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Republic of Poland, EFTA Surveillance Authority (Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax rulings issued by a Member State – Selective tax advantages – Allocation of profits generated by intellectual property licences to branches of non-resident companies – Arm’s length principle)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0466: Case C-466/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — HEITEC AG v HEITECH Promotion GmbH, RW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 9 — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Articles 54, 110 and 111 — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Concept of ‘acquiescence’ — Interruption of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Sending of a warning letter — Date of interruption of the period of limitation in the event of a court action being initiated — Effects of limitation — Application for damages, the provision of information and destruction of goods)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0468: Case C-468/20, Fastweb and Others (Time frame for billing): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Fastweb SpA, TIM SpA, Vodafone Italia SpA, Wind Tre SpA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications networks and services — Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Article 56 TFUE — Freedom to provide services — National legislation granting the national regulatory authority the power to impose on telephony service providers a minimum time frame for the renewal of offers and a minimum time frame for billing — Consumer protection — Principle of proportional

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0470: Case C-470/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — AS Veejaam, OÜ Espo v AS Elering (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Renewable energy subsidy — Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 — Incentive effect of aid applied for after work has started on the project concerned — Article 108(3) TFEU — Obligation to notify — Consequences of breach of the obligation to notify)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0472: Case C-472/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Loan contracts — Loan denominated in a foreign currency and repayable in the national currency — Contractual term placing the foreign exchange risk on the consumer — Unfairness of a term relating to the main subject matter of the contract — Effects — Invalidity of the contract — Serious damage to the consumer — Effectiveness of Directive 93/13 — Non-binding opinion of the supreme court — Possibility of restoring the parties to the situation they would have been in if that contract had not been c

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0473: Case C-473/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Invest Fund Management’ AD v Komisia za finansov nadzor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2009/65/EC — Undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) — UCITS management companies — Obligations concerning information to be provided to investors — Article 72 — Obligation to keep the ‘essential elements of the prospectus’ up to date — Scope — Article 69(2) — Information specified in Schedule A of Annex I — Composition of a body of the management company — Article 99a(r) — Transposition into national law — National regulation extending the scope for detection of

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0475: Joined Cases C-475/20 to C-482/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 September 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Admiral Gaming Network Srl and Others v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli and Others (References for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Restrictions — Betting and gambling — Licences for the management of games played on gaming machines — National legislation imposing a levy on licence holders — Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0483: Case C-483/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — XXXX v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 33(2)(a) — Inadmissibility of an application for international protection lodged in a Member State by a third-country national who has obtained refugee status in another Member State, where the minor child of that third-country national, who is a beneficiary of subsidiary protection status, resides in the first Member State — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 7 — Right to respect

RSS
First820821822823825827828829Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top