Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0538: Case C-538/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt B v W AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Articles 49 and 54 TFEU — Deduction of final losses incurred by a non-resident permanent establishment — State which has waived its power to impose taxes under a double taxation convention — Comparability of situations)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0541: Joined Cases C-541/20 to C-555/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – Republic of Lithuania and Others v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Mobility package – Posting and working time) (Action for annulment – First package of mobility measures (Mobility Package) – Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 – Maximum daily and weekly driving times – Minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods – Organisation of the work of the drivers in such a way that the drivers are able to return every three or four weeks, depending on the case, to their place of residence or to the operational centre of their employer to begin and spend their regular or compensatory weekly rest period – Prohibition on taking regular or compensatory weekly rest in the vehicl

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0556: Case C-556/20: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Schneider Electric SE and Others v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Economie, des Finances et de la Relance (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 90/435/EEC — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Article 4 and Article 7(2) — Prevention of economic double taxation of dividends)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0559: Case C-559/20: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Koch Media GmbH v FU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 14 — Concepts of ‘legal costs’ and ‘other expenses’ — Warning notice in order to ensure enforcement of intellectual property rights out of court — Lawyers’ fees — Classification — National provision limiting the amount of those costs recoverable under certain conditions)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0560: Case C-560/20, Landeshauptmann von Wien (Family reunification with a minor refugee): Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien — Austria) — CR, GF, TY v Landeshauptmann von Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 10(3)(a) — Family reunification of an unaccompanied minor refugee with his or her first-degree relatives in the direct ascending line — Article 2(f) — Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ — Minor sponsor at the time of submission of the application but who attained majority during the family reunification procedure — Relevant date for assessing minor status — P

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0561: Case C-561/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel — Belgium) — Q, R, S v United Airlines Inc. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Connecting flight consisting of two legs — Significant delay to final destination caused in the second leg of that flight linking two airports in a third country — Validity of that regulation under international law)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0562: Case C-562/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘Rodl & Partner’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing — Directive (EU) 2015/849 — Article 18(1) and (3) — Point 3(b) of Annex III — Risk-based approach — Risk assessment carried out by obliged entities — Identification of risks by Member States and obliged entities — Customer due diligence measures — Enhanced due diligence measures — High-corruption-risk third countries — Article 13(1)(c) and (d) — Evidence and documentation requirements for obliged entities — Article 14(5) — Ongoin

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0563: Case C-563/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Directive 2001/14/EC — Article 4 — Setting of infrastructure charges by decision of the manager — Article 30(2) — Railway undertakings’ right to bring an administrative action — Article 30(6) — Judicial review of the decisions of the regulatory body)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0564: Case C-564/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — PF, MF v Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Sea Fisheries Protection Authority (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Control system — Article 33(2)(a) and Article 34 — Recording of catches and fishing effort — Transmission to the European Commission of information concerning the quantities of nephrops caught — Possibility to use data other than those contained in the fishing logbook — Reasonable and scientifically valid method to process and verify data — Closure of fisheries)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0567: Case C-567/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski građanski sud u Zagrebu — Croatia) — A.H. v Zagrebačka banka d.d (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Unfair terms — Directive 93/13/EEC — Applicability of ratione temporis — Article 10(1) — Loan agreement concluded prior to Member State’s accession to the EU but amended after that date — Article 6 — Reimbursement of benefits improperly obtained by the seller or supplier — National legislation providing for the replacement of unfair terms and reimbursement of the overpayment — Applicability of ratione materiae — Article 1(2) — Exclusion of contractual terms which reflect mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions)

RSS
First824825826827829831832833Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top