Search
× Search
Menu
    1. User Profile New
    2. Privacy policy
    1. Svetovanje - davčno materialno pravo
    2. Davčno svetovanje - davčno procesno pravo
    3. Svetovanje - Korporacijsko pravo
    4. Drugo mnenje v davčnih zadevah
    5. Izobraževanja iz davčnega, korporacijskega in povezanega prava podjetij
    1. Izvajanje storitev Računovodenja v Mreži Modro Poslovanje
    1. Kontakti TAXIN d.o.o. - Partner svetovalci za davčno in poslovno svetovanje
    2. TAXIN - PRICE LIST2024
    3. Kontakti MODRO JUTRO D.O.O. - Partner izvajalec računovodskih storitev
    1. Sodna praksa Sodišča EU, lastni članki, spremembe davčne zakonodaje....
    2. Pravice plačnikov davkov v Sloveniji - TAXPAYERS RIGHTS in SLOVENIA
    3. mag. Derganc Franc BLOG
    1. WBN-info
    2. GGF Apartmani, GGF 4 YOU doživetje
    3. Pridružite se Svetovalcem in Izvajalcem mreže modro poslovanje
    4. Povpraševanje za računovodenje v Mreži modro poslovanje
    5. Želim analizo skladnosti poslovanja podjetij - 001MMP
    6. Želim storitev DRUGO MNENJE V DAVČNIH ZADEVAH oz. davčni ali poslovni nasvet
    7. Dogodki Modro Poslovanje

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

BAZA ZNANJA
0 0

CELEX:62020CA0368: Joined Cases C-368/20 and C-369/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark — Austria) — NW v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark (C-368/20), Bezirkshauptmannschaft Leibnitz (C-369/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Free movement of persons — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Schengen Borders Code — Article 25(4) — Temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders for a maximum total duration of six months — National legislation providing for a number of successive periods of border control resulting in that duration being exceeded — Non-compliance of such legislation with Article 25(4) of the Schengen Borders Code where the su

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0370: Case C-370/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Pro Rauchfrei eV v JS e.K. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Directive 2014/40/EU — Labelling and packaging — Article 8(8) — Health warnings which must appear on each unit packet of a tobacco product and any outside packaging — Automatic vending machine for cigarette packets — Health warnings not visible from the outside — Representation of unit packets — Concept of ‘images’ of unit packets and any outside packaging targeting consumers in the European Union)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0374: Case C-374/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 December 2021 — Agrochem-Maks d.o.o. v European Commission, Kingdom of Sweden (Appeal — Plant protection products — Active substance — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Article 6(f) — Annex II, point 2.2 — Definition of ‘further confirmatory information’ — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 — Article 13(3) — Non-renewal of approval of the active substance ‘oxasulfuron’ for its placing on the market — Scope of the rapporteur Member State’s decision to declare the application for renewal to be admissible — Right of that Member State and of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to require the applicant to provide further information — Right of the rapporteur Member State to amend its draft renewal assessment

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0376: Case C-376/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 July 2023 — European Commission v CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, EE Ltd (Appeal — Competition — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Control of concentrations of undertakings — Mobile telecommunications services — Decision declaring a concentration incompatible with the internal market — Oligopolistic market — Significant impediment to effective competition — Non-coordinated effects — Standard of proof — European Commission’s margin of discretion with regard to economic matters — Limits of judicial review — Guidelines on horizontal mergers — Factors relevant to demonstrating a significant impediment to effective competition — Concepts of ‘important competitive for

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0377: Case C-377/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2022 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Servizio Elettrico Nazionale SpA, ENEL SpA, Enel Energia SpA v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Dominant position — Abuse — Article 102 TFEU — Effect of a practice on the well-being of consumers and on the structure of the market — Exclusionary abuse — Whether the practice is capable of having an exclusionary effect — Use of methods other than those coming within the scope of competition on the merits — Hypothetical as-efficient competitor unable to replicate the practice — Existence of an anticompetitive intent — Opening up of the market for the sale of

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0385: Case C-385/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia no 49 de Barcelona — Spain) — EL, TP v Caixabank SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of equivalence — Judicial proceedings seeking a declaration that a contractual term is unfair — National court's power of review of its own motion — National proceedings for taxation of costs — Costs recoverable in respect of lawyers’ fees)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0389: Case C-389/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 2 de Vigo — Spain) — CJ v Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security — Directive 79/7/EEC — Article 4(1) — Prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of sex — Domestic workers — Protection against unemployment — Exclusion — Particular disadvantage to female workers — Legitimate social policy objectives — Proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0391: Case C-391/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Latvijas Republikas Satversmes tiesa — Latvia) — proceedings brought by Boriss Cilevičs and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Restriction — Justification — The organisation of education systems — Institutions of higher education — Obligation to provide courses of study in the official language of the Member State concerned — Article 4(2) TEU — National identity of a Member State — Defence and promotion of the official language of a Member State — Principle of proportionality)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0394: Case C-394/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — XY v Finanzamt V (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of capital — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — National legislation on inheritance tax — Immovable property situated in a Member State — Limited tax liability — Different treatment of residents and non-residents — Right to an allowance on the taxable value — Proportionate reduction in the case of limited tax liability — Liabilities under reserved portions — No deduction in the case of limited tax liability)

0 0

CELEX:62020CA0394: Zadeva C-394/20: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 21. decembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Nemčija) – XY/Finanzamt V (Predhodno odločanje – Prosti pretok kapitala – Člena 63 in 65 PDEU – Nacionalna ureditev davka na dediščine – Nepremičnine na nacionalnem ozemlju – Omejena davčna obveznost – Različno obravnavanje rezidentov in nerezidentov – Pravica do odbitka od davčne osnove – Sorazmerno znižanje v primeru omejene davčne obveznosti – Obveznosti v zvezi z nujnimi deleži – Neobstoj odbitka v primeru omejene davčne obveznosti)

CELEX:62020CA0394: Zadeva C-394/20: Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 21. decembra 2021 (predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Nemčija) – XY/Finanzamt V (Predhodno odločanje – Prosti pretok kapitala – Člena 63 in 65 PDEU – Nacionalna ureditev davka na dediščine – Nepremičnine na nacionalnem ozemlju – Omejena davčna obveznost – Različno obravnavanje rezidentov in nerezidentov – Pravica do odbitka od davčne osnove – Sorazmerno znižanje v primeru omejene davčne obveznosti – Obveznosti v zvezi z nujnimi deleži – Neobstoj odbitka v primeru omejene davčne obveznosti)
RSS
First816817818819821823824825Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top