julij 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0872: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0872_SUM: Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0874: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P.
september 30, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0874_INF: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-874/25 P.
julij 02, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0875: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P.
september 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0875_INF: Order of the Court of 24 June 2026.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-875/25 P.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0876: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Robert Wandert Jagtenberg v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Obligation for non-privileged parties to be represented before the Courts of the European Union – Third and seventh paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statue of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Prohibition on ‘self-representation’ – University teacher – Right of audience – Proof – Appeal clearly inadmissible.#Case C-876/25 P.
september 30, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0876_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Robert Wandert Jagtenberg v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Obligation for non-privileged parties to be represented before the Courts of the European Union – Third and seventh paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statue of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Prohibition on ‘self-representation’ – University teacher – Right of audience – Proof – Appeal clearly inadmissible.#Case C-876/25 P.
maj 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0883: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 4 mai 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt contre Royaume d'Espagne.#Recours introduit par une personne physique contre un État membre – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Incompétence manifeste de la Cour.#Affaire C-883/25. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 19, 2026 0 6 CELEX:62025CO0883_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026.#María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain.#Case C-883/25.