julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0849_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-849/25 P.
junij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0850: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.
avgust 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0850_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.
junij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0851: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.
avgust 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0851_INF: Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.
september 10, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0852: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 2 septembre 2026.#J.L.Q. contre Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) et Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-852/25. This document does not exist in English.
april 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0867: Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0867_INF: Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.
junij 25, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0868: Order of the Court of 30 April 2026.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-868/25 P.
avgust 13, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0868_INF: Order of the Court of 30 April 2026.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-868/25 P.