januar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0257: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2025.#B.V. v I.J.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judges’ retirement pensions – Basis of calculation – No account taken of posting allowance – Exclusion for reasons linked to requirements to eliminate a government deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the Member States’ legislature and executive to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-257/25.
februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0257_SUM: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2025.#B.V. v I.J.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Neamţ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judges’ retirement pensions – Basis of calculation – No account taken of posting allowance – Exclusion for reasons linked to requirements to eliminate a government deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the Member States’ legislature and executive to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-257/25.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0270(01): Order of the President of the Court of 29 October 2025.#Andrey Melnichenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of the applicant’s funds and economic resources – Applicant for leave to intervene mentioned by name, as a company owned and then formerly owned by that applicant, in the statement of reasons underlying the restrictive measures adopted against it – Effect of those measures on the applicant for leave to intervene – Leave to intervene granted.#Case C-270/25 P.
januar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0272: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Conditions of admissibility of the action – Direct concern – Evidence.#Case C-272/25 P.
april 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0272_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Maud Tea & Seed Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Plant protection products – Active substances clothianidin and thiamethoxam – Determination of maximum residue levels for the relevant active substances in or on certain products – Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 – Conditions of admissibility of the action – Direct concern – Evidence.#Case C-272/25 P.
januar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0293: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#RT.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Mandat d’arrêt européen émis aux fins d’exécution d’une peine privative de liberté – Article 4, point 6 – Motif de non-exécution facultative du mandat d’arrêt européen – Décision-cadre 2008/909/JAI – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Reconnaissance d’un jugement prononçant une peine privative de liberté aux fins de l’exécution de la condamnation – Article 25 – Respect des conditions et de la procédure prévues par cette décision-cadre dans le cas où un Éta This document does not exist in English.
marec 10, 2026 0 11 CELEX:62025CO0293_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RT v Sofiyska apelativna prokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Case C-293/25.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0303: Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.
januar 14, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0303_INF: Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.
december 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0304: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 décembre 2025.#Lidl Bulgaria EOOD et KO KD contre Nachalnik na otdel „Operativni deynosti“ v GD „Fiskalen kontrol“ v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte factuel et réglementaire du litige au principal – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-304/25. This document does not exist in English.