april 30, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0573: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.
maj 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0573_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 April 2026.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the potato variety Melrose – Failure to pay the annual fee on time – Cancellation of right – Application for restitutio in integrum – Competence of the Board of Appeal – Concept of ‘particular circumstances’ – Conditions for notification of decisions and communications of the CPVO.#Case T-573/24.
februar 25, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0575: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 25 February 2026.#Belgische Staat / Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Digipolis Antwerpen AG and District09 AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Scope – Liability to tax – Body governed by public law – Articles 2, 9 and 13 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Intermunicipal cooperation – Conferral of management – Commissioning association – Provision of telematics services for the benefit of members of the association.#Case T-575/24.
april 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0575_SUM: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 25 February 2026.#Belgische Staat / Federale Overheidsdienst Financiën v Digipolis Antwerpen AG and District09 AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Scope – Liability to tax – Body governed by public law – Articles 2, 9 and 13 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Intermunicipal cooperation – Conferral of management – Commissioning association – Provision of telematics services for the benefit of members of the association.#Case T-575/24.
september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0582: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.
november 29, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0582_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0585: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0585_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0586: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0586_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.