Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0563: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Làv – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-563/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0563_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Làv – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-563/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0564: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Lav – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-564/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0564_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Lav – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-564/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0572: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#SiLog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Si Log International – Earlier national word mark SILOG – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard.#Case T-572/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024TJ0572_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#SiLog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Si Log International – Earlier national word mark SILOG – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Right to be heard.#Case T-572/24.

RSS
First28372838283928402842284428452846Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top