maj 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0282: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark IT’S B – Earlier national figurative mark B! – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-282/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0282_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark IT’S B – Earlier national figurative mark B! – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-282/24.
maj 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0283: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark It’s B – Earlier national figurative mark B! – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-283/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0283_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark It’s B – Earlier national figurative mark B! – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-283/24.
december 05, 2025 0 13 CELEX:62024TJ0285: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Case T-285/24.
februar 19, 2026 0 12 CELEX:62024TJ0285_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 3 December 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Case T-285/24.
september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0288: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a sound of a melody – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-288/24.
september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0288_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a sound of a melody – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-288/24.
julij 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0289: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre élargie) du 2 juillet 2025.#Brasserie Nationale (anc. Brasseries Funck-Bricher et Bofferding) et Munhowen SA contre Commission européenne.#* Langue de procédure : le français. Concurrence – Concentrations – Marché de la distribution en gros de boissons – Article 22 du règlement (CE) no 139/2004 – Demande de renvoi à la Commission émanant d’une autorité de la concurrence d’un État membre non compétente selon la législation nationale pour examiner l’opération de concentration – Décision de la Commission d’examiner l’opération de concentration – Délai de présentation de la demande de renvoi – Notion de “communication” – Information des entreprises concernées sur la demande de renvoi – Régime linguistique – Délai de notification This document does not exist in English.
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0289_RES: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre élargie) du 2 juillet 2025.#Brasserie Nationale (anc. Brasseries Funck-Bricher et Bofferding) et Munhowen SA contre Commission européenne.#Concurrence – Concentrations – Marché de la distribution en gros de boissons – Article 22 du règlement (CE) no 139/2004 – Demande de renvoi à la Commission émanant d’une autorité de la concurrence d’un État membre non compétente selon la législation nationale pour examiner l’opération de concentration – Décision de la Commission d’examiner l’opération de concentration – Délai de présentation de la demande de renvoi – Notion de “communication” – Information des entreprises concernées sur la demande de renvoi – Régime linguistique – Délai de notification de la décision de la Commission d This document does not exist in English.