november 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0344: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 11 novembre 2024.#Christos Papasotiriou contre Conseil de l'Union européenne et Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 19 du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne – Pourvoi introduit sans le ministère d’un avocat – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-344/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
februar 12, 2025 0 105 CELEX:62024CO0344_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 November 2024.#Christos Papasotiriou v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Case C-344/24 P.
julij 16, 2026 0 8 CELEX:62024CO0350: Ordonnance de rectification du 8 juillet 2026.#HJ contre Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank.#Rectification d’arrêt.#Affaire C-350/24. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0355: Order of the Court of 24 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-355/24 P.
februar 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0355_INF: Order of the Court of 24 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-355/24 P.
avgust 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0360: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 16 juillet 2024.#Yeguada de Milagro SA contre Tribunal Constitucional.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Droit institutionnel – Article 263 TFUE – Recours en annulation dirigés contre des juridictions nationales – Incompétence manifeste du Tribunal de l’Union européenne – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-360/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
februar 04, 2025 0 49 CELEX:62024CO0360_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#Yeguada de Milagro, SA v Tribunal Constitucional.#Case C-360/24 P.
oktober 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0362: Order of the Court of 2 October 2024.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-362/24 P.
januar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0372: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025.#B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Requirement that remuneration is commensurate with the importance of the functions carried out – Obligation to take into account the n
maj 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0374: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 24 avril 2025.#UF contre Union Nationale des Mutualités Libres (Partenamut) (UNMLibres).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-374/24. This document does not exist in English.