december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0323: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.
februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0323_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0325: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#HG v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)
februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0325_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#HG v Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Firenze.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure –
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0326: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus as regards democracy, the rule of law and human rights – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance on those lists of Belarusian undertakings almost wholly owned by the State – Listing criterion related to ‘support to the Lukashenko regime’ – Obligation imposed on certain Belarusian undertakings owned or controlled by the State to pay part of their profits to the State pursuant to a mandatory State measure.#Case C-326/24 P.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0326_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Grodno Azot AAT and Khimvolokno Plant v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus as regards democracy, the rule of law and human rights – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance on those lists of Belarusian undertakings almost wholly owned by the State – Listing criterion related to ‘support to the Lukashenko regime’ – Obligation imposed on certain Belarusian undertakings owned or controlled by the State to pay part of their profits to the State pursuant to a mandatory State measure.#Case C-326/24 P.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0327: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Telekom Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Electronic Communications Code – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – Access remedies imposed on undertakings with significant market power – Article 72 – Obligations of access to civil engineering assets – Conditions.#Case C-327/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0327_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Telekom Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Electronic Communications Code – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – Access remedies imposed on undertakings with significant market power – Article 72 – Obligations of access to civil engineering assets – Conditions.#Case C-327/24.
april 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0328: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Appeal – Institutional law – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – Article 42(1) – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by the national courts – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to review the legality of EU acts – Article 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Article 2
april 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0328_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Appeal – Institutional law – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – Article 42(1) – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by the national courts – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to review the legality of EU acts – Article 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Artic